Draft:Rajesh Gadia

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 5,125 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Rajesh Gadia (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 6 days ago by AnjaliUrk (talk: D · +) · Last edited 4 days ago by Balabush

Submission declined on 4 July 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by DoubleGrazing 10 days ago. Last edited by Balabush 4 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Comment: Sources where the subject is commenting on things do not contribute towards notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:28, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Rajesh Gadia is an Indian physician specializing in internal medicine. He is a consultant in the Department of General Medicine at K.E.M. Hospital, Pune. His clinical interests include infectious diseases, particularly dengue fever, fever of unknown origin (FUO), and critical care medicine.^[1] He is a co-author of a peer-reviewed study on dengue fever.^[2]

Career

Rajesh Gadia is a consultant in the Department of General Medicine at K.E.M. Hospital, Pune. His areas of clinical practice include infectious diseases, particularly dengue fever, fever of unknown origin (FUO), and critical care medicine.^[1] He has served as a postgraduate teacher and guide for the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) Diploma course.^[1] In addition to his clinical practice, he has contributed to clinical research on infectious diseases, including dengue fever.^[2]According to a 2018 report in Hindustan Times, Gadia was the project director of K.E.M. Hospital's dengue research project, which had completed 20 years and had treated more than 6,000 patients.^[3]

Research

Rajesh Gadia has contributed to research on infectious diseases, particularly dengue fever. He was a co-author of the study Clinical Findings and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Dengue Patients in Western India: A Facility-Based Study, published in PLOS ONE in 2010. The study investigated the clinical characteristics and pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in patients with dengue in western India.^[2]

Selected publications

Priyadarshini D, Gadia RR, Tripathy A, Gurukumar KR, Bhagat A, Patwardhan S, et al. (2010). "Clinical Findings and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Dengue Patients in Western India: A Facility-Based Study". PLOS ONE. 5 (8): e12233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012233. PMID 20090849.^[2]

References

1 2 3 "Rajesh Gadia". K.E.M. Hospital Pune. Retrieved 4 July 2026.
1 2 3 4 Priyadarshini (2010-08-25). "Clinical Findings and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Dengue Patients in Western India: A Facility-Based Study". PLOS ONE. 5 (8): e12233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012233. PMC 2806829. PMID 20090849.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
↑ "Pune study states dengue has grown 100-fold in the past two decades". Hindustan Times. HT Digital Streams Ltd. 13 October 2018. Retrieved 9 July 2026.

[kemprofile-1] 1 2 3 "Rajesh Gadia". K.E.M. Hospital Pune. Retrieved 4 July 2026.

[denguestudy-2] 1 2 3 4 Priyadarshini (2010-08-25). "Clinical Findings and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Dengue Patients in Western India: A Facility-Based Study". PLOS ONE. 5 (8): e12233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012233. PMC 2806829. PMID 20090849.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)

[ht2018study-3] "Pune study states dengue has grown 100-fold in the past two decades". Hindustan Times. HT Digital Streams Ltd. 13 October 2018. Retrieved 9 July 2026.

[1]

[2]

[3]