Submission rejected on 22 April 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Rejected by ChrysGalley 46 days ago. Last edited by Bonadea 43 days ago. |  |
Submission declined on 20 April 2026 by Squawk7700 (talk). Declined by Squawk7700 48 days ago. |  |
Submission declined on 18 April 2026 by Quinntropy (talk). This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
Declined by Quinntropy 50 days ago.You must place an inline citation directly after:
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
| |
Submission declined on 17 April 2026 by ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
Declined by ThatTrainGuy1945 51 days ago.You must place an inline citation directly after:
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
| |
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Dan arndt 52 days ago.
| |
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Dan arndt 53 days ago.
| |
Comment: Constantly resubmitted without previous review comments being addressed. Time to move on. ChrysGalley (talk) 12:30, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: Again resubmitted without any change (previous decline stands) - please start by fixing the citations Squawk7700 (talk) 23:28, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: Resubmitted without any change. Previous decline still stands as valid. Continuing to resubmit without necessary changes may lead to rejection. • Quinn (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: Saving Dan the time here. 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 Peep peep! 14:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: Fail WP:ANYBIO, requires inline citations referencing reliable independent secondary sources (see WP:REFB). Dan arndt (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Noah Marbach is an American technology entrepreneur and founder of XShift AI, an artificial intelligence workforce scheduling software platform.[1]
Early life and education
editMarbach developed XShift AI while attending high school in Marietta, Georgia.[2]
Career
editMarbach founded XShift AI as a workforce scheduling platform designed to automate employee scheduling using artificial intelligence tools.[3]
Coverage of the company and its development appeared in technology and restaurant industry publications including Restaurant Business Online and Modern Restaurant Management.[4][5]
Regional startup publication Hypepotamus reported on Marbach’s founding of XShift AI while he was still a student.[6]
- ↑ "Marietta high school student designs AI software to streamline employee scheduling". CBS News. 2026.
- ↑ "Metro Atlanta high schooler tackles work schedules with AI, founds tech company before graduation". WSB-TV. 2026.
- ↑ "Marietta high school student designs AI software to streamline employee scheduling". CBS News. 2026.
- ↑ "How a restaurant tech startup is born these days". Restaurant Business Online. 2026.
- ↑ "How voice-first AI can fix restaurant schedule headaches". Modern Restaurant Management. 2026.
- ↑ "High school founder builds AI shift scheduling startup". Hypepotamus. 2026.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.