Submission rejected on 27 February 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Pythoncoder 3 months ago. Last edited by Pythoncoder 3 months ago. |
Submission declined on 22 February 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by ChrysGalley 3 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
Comment: Still LLM output —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Unlike the historical study of medieval psychological thought, the modern discipline focuses on developing ontologically and epistemologically rooted frameworks for mental healthcare within Muslim populations
- AI and incorrectly sourced - the source here says something quite different to the draft. ChrysGalley (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Khanfahadh (talk) 04:19, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
| Discipline | Psychology; Islamic studies |
|---|---|
| Related fields | Clinical psychology; Psychology of religion; Spiritually integrated psychotherapy |
| Modern development | Late 20th century (as a contemporary movement) |
Islamic psychology (Arabic: ʿilm al-nafs; lit. “science of the self/soul”) is a term used for modern scholarly and applied approaches that examine psychological theory and practice in relation to Islamic sources, concepts, and Muslim contexts. Scholars have noted that the term is used in multiple ways, and has been the subject of definitional debate and proposed conceptual frameworks within the academic literature.[1][2]
Scope and concepts
editAcademic writing on Islamic psychology commonly distinguishes between (1) conceptual work that draws on Islamic theology, philosophy, and ethics to discuss the person (for example, discussions of the nafs and related terms), and (2) applied work concerned with counseling, psychotherapy, and mental health care with Muslim clients and communities.[1][2][3]
History
editModern discussions of Islamic psychology are often linked to late-20th-century calls for developing psychology and psychotherapy approaches that are culturally and religiously meaningful for Muslims.[2][1]
A frequently cited early critique is Malik Badri’s The Dilemma of Muslim Psychologists (1979), which argued against uncritical application of Eurocentric theories and encouraged engagement with indigenous concepts and traditions.[4]
Alongside modern work, scholarship has also documented pre-modern Muslim writings on the soul, character, and human nature, and discussed how they relate to contemporary psychological topics.[3]
Clinical and applied work
editClinical publications on psychotherapy with Muslim clients describe approaches in which Islamic beliefs and practices may be incorporated when clinically appropriate and aligned with client preferences.[5]
Some contemporary models propose Islamic conceptions of the self and soul (for example, discussions of fitrah, nafs, qalb, ʿaql, and rūḥ) as a framework for assessment and intervention in psychotherapy.[6]
Publication venues
editResearch related to Islamic psychology and Muslim mental health appears in journals in psychology of religion, psychotherapy, and interdisciplinary outlets focused on Muslim mental health. The Journal of Muslim Mental Health is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes articles exploring social, cultural, medical, theological, historical, and psychological factors affecting the mental health of Muslims in the United States and globally.[7][8]
Journals explicitly focused on Islamic psychology are also published in Muslim-majority countries, including Indonesia, where multiple university- and association-based journals publish research and conceptual papers under this label.[9][10][11]
References
edit- 1 2 3 Al-Karam, Carrie York (2018). "Islamic Psychology: Towards a 21st Century Definition and Conceptual Framework". Journal of Islamic Ethics. 2: 97–109. doi:10.1163/24685542-12340020.
- 1 2 3 Iqbal, Naved; Skinner, Rasjid (2021). "Islamic psychology: Emergence and current challenges". Archive for the Psychology of Religion. 43 (1): 65–77. doi:10.1177/0084672420983496.
- 1 2 Haque, Amber (2004). "Psychology from Islamic Perspective: Contributions of Early Muslim Scholars and Challenges to Contemporary Muslim Psychologists". Journal of Religion and Health. 43 (4): 357–377. doi:10.1007/s10943-004-4302-z.
- ↑ Haque, Amber; Khan, Fahad; Keshavarzi, Hooman; Rothman, Abdallah E. (2016). "Integrating Islamic Traditions in Modern Psychology: Research Trends in Last Ten Years". Journal of Muslim Mental Health. 10 (1): 75–100. doi:10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0010.107.
- ↑ Abu-Raiya, Hisham; Pargament, Kenneth I. (2010). "Religiously integrated psychotherapy with Muslim clients: From research to practice". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 41 (2): 181–188. doi:10.1037/a0017988.
- ↑ Rothman, Abdallah E. (2018). "Toward a Framework for Islamic Psychology and Psychotherapy: An Islamic Model of the Soul". Journal of Religion and Health. 57 (5): 1731–1744. Retrieved 2026-02-25.
- ↑ "Journal of Muslim Mental Health". Michigan Publishing. Retrieved 2026-02-25.
- ↑ "Journal of Muslim Mental Health (DOAJ)". Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved 2026-02-25.
- ↑ "IJIP: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Psychology". IAIN Salatiga e-Journal. Retrieved 2026-02-25.
- ↑ "Asian Journal of Islamic Psychology". Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Journals. Retrieved 2026-02-25.
- ↑ "International Journal of Islamic Psychology (Online)". ISSN Portal. Retrieved 2026-02-25.


- Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
- Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.