 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,502 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 17 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: The subject could be notable, and via independent reviews of their work this could surely be demonstrated. However using Youtube for notability is best avoided, see WP:YOUTUBE, which then leaves one government press release and a less than reliable solo source. Under WP:SIRS we will need better sourcing for this, so some more work here please. ChrysGalley (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
| 香港譜樂管弦樂協會 | |
| Formation | 2007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Music organisation |
| Focus | Orchestra training and music education |
| Location |
|
| Website | https://www.hkpmo.org |
Hong Kong Post-Modern Orchestra Association (Chinese: 香港譜樂管弦樂協會) is a Hong Kong-based music organisation focused on orchestral training, music education, and concert performance.
Founded in 2007, the association organises orchestral training programmes and public performances involving youth and adult musicians. Its activities include orchestra rehearsals, instrumental training, and concert performances in Hong Kong cultural venues.
Activities
editThe association operates orchestral ensembles and music training programmes for students and adult musicians. Its programmes include orchestral rehearsals, instrumental lessons, and public performances.
The association has organised concerts and rehearsals in cultural venues in Hong Kong, including facilities managed by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department.
Media coverage
editThe association and its activities have been mentioned in Hong Kong media.
A 2019 feature in Sing Tao Daily's Smart Parents magazine discussed saxophone learning and music education activities related to the association.[1]
The association was also mentioned in a 2020 Ming Pao report discussing orchestral rehearsals and music education during the COVID-19 pandemic.[2]
An earlier magazine article published in 2013 in Children's Elite Education also featured an interview discussing saxophone education and music training activities related to the association.[3]
See also
edit• Music education in Hong Kong • Orchestra
External links
edit• Official website
References
edit- ↑ "年輕多變的色士風". Sing Tao Daily (in Chinese).
- ↑ "吹奏管樂器有播毒風險？樂器班：如擔心可視像上課". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 15 October 2020.
- ↑ "年輕多變的色士風" (PDF) (in Chinese).
- Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
- Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.