Submission declined on 10 June 2026 by Dafootballguy (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Comment: Is there any way you could possibly find links to online copies of your sources, if they exist? It would greatly help reviewers, and probably speed up the process for you. Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hayawic Logic of Form (Arabic: المنطق الحيوي التوحيدي للشكل), also referred to as Hayawic Logic or UniLogic, is a philosophical framework articulated by Raiek Alnakari during the 1970s and 1980s. The theory proposes a dynamic interpretation of “form” as a relational and process-oriented principle rather than a fixed metaphysical structure. It emerged within Syrian intellectual debates in the late twentieth century and has been discussed in academic contexts.
Conceptual outline
editHayawic Logic presents “form” (الشكل) as a relational configuration characterized by movement, containment, probability, and relativity.[1]
The framework articulates five general principles describing entities as form-structured, dynamic, inclusive, probabilistic, and relative.
Intellectual reception
editThe framework was debated in Syrian literary and philosophical circles during the 1970s.
In 1974, Jalal Farouq al-Sharif published a critical analysis of the hayawic framework in the journal Al-Mawqif al-Adabi.[2]
Maurice Janji examined the theoretical premises of the concept in his article “المادية الديالكتيكية في «الأيديولوجية الحيوية»,” published in Al-Maʿrifa.[3]
A symposium held at the University of Damascus Department of Philosophy discussing Al-Insān Shakl was reported in the Syrian newspaper Al-Baʿth (22 October 1974).[4]
In 1978, Muhammad al-Rashid devoted a chapter entitled “Wahdat Wujūd Ḥayawiyya” in his book Wahdat al-Wujūd fī al-Taṣawwuf, published by the Syrian Ministry of Culture, examining conceptual intersections related to hayawic thought.[5]
Michel Seurat referred to a movement associated with Raiek al-Nuqarî in La Syrie d’aujourd’hui (1980), describing it as initially philosophical in orientation before acquiring a political dimension.[6]
Mahmoud Istinbuli later discussed the framework in “Qiwā al-Tajdīd wa-l-Inghilāq fī al-Manṭiq al-Ḥayawī” (1989), situating it within debates on renewal and closure in contemporary Arab thought.[7]
A doctoral study by Ammar Ayyash (Université de Ouargla, 2017) examined the epistemological dimensions of Hayawic Logic within contemporary Arab philosophical discourse.[8]
Academic activity in the United States
editIn 2000, Raiek Alnakari co-authored with David C. Rine a paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, addressing a four-valued logical model for communication analysis.[9]
References
edit- ↑ Alnakari, Raiek (1984). Le principe hayawi dans la pensée philosophique et politique arabe contemporaine. Doctorat d’État thesis, Université Paris 8.
- ↑ Al-Sharif, Jalal Farouq (1974). "حول الأيديولوجية الحيوية". Al-Mawqif al-Adabi. Damascus.
- ↑ Janji, Maurice (1974). "المادية الديالكتيكية في «الأيديولوجية الحيوية»". Al-Maʿrifa. Damascus.
- ↑ "ندوة في قسم الفلسفة حول كتاب الإنسان شكل". Al-Baʿth. Damascus. 22 October 1974.
- ↑ Al-Rashid, Muhammad (1978). Wahdat al-Wujūd fī al-Taṣawwuf. Damascus: Syrian Ministry of Culture.
- ↑ Seurat, Michel (1980). In André Raymond (ed.), La Syrie d’aujourd’hui. Paris: CNRS / CERMOC.
- ↑ Istinbuli, Mahmoud (1989). "قوى التجديد والانغلاق في المنطق الحيوي". [journal details].
- ↑ Ayyash, Ammar (2017). La théorie hayawique de la connaissance chez Raïk Al-Nakari. Université de Ouargla.
- ↑ Rine, David C.; Alnakari, Raiek (2000). "A Four-Valued Logic B(4) of E(9) for Modeling Human Communication". IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic.

- Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
- Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.