 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 5,186 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Business model stress testing (BMST) is a method in business model research and corporate strategy used to assess the robustness and agility of a business model against future uncertainties, such as changes in digital technology, regulations, competitor behavior, and market dynamics.[1][2] It was introduced in 2017 by Timber Haaker, Harry Bouwman, Wil Janssen, and Mark de Reuver.[1]
Background
editBusiness models and business model innovation have received increasing attention in both practice and academic literature, but the long-term robustness of a business model is seldom systematically tested against fast and unpredictable environmental changes. Business model stress testing was first described in the journal Futures as a method specifically designed for evaluating business model robustness against future uncertainties.[1] A related paper by Bouwman and colleagues framed stress testing not only as a risk-assessment tool but as a crucial means of achieving continuous business model agility.[2]
Methodology and frameworks
editIn its original formulation, BMST describes the business model in a structured way using the Business Model Canvas. A set of relevant future uncertainties is then defined through scenario planning. The impact of these scenarios on individual business model components and their interrelations is assessed and visualised (for example, as a heat map) to identify the most vulnerable areas, from which actionable measures to strengthen the model are derived. The originators described a six-step procedure supported by spreadsheet-based tooling.[1]
The method has since been expanded into more comprehensive and holistic frameworks. Notably, a 2025 book-length treatment by Lars Heim, published in the Springer Gabler "Future of Business and Finance" series, links BMST with other established methods to provide a broader strategic analysis.[3] In this extended approach, the description of the business model combines the Business Model Canvas with the Value Proposition Canvas and the Jobs-to-be-Done framework. It structures the analysis around the systematic identification and evaluation of external stress factors, such as megatrends and market dynamics, organised within a "Business Model Environment Map." This adaptation transforms the original spreadsheet concept into a step-by-step, workshop-oriented procedure, making the methodology accessible for practical corporate application. The framework is available in both English and German editions.[3]
Applications and reception
editSince its introduction, the BMST method has been widely cited and applied across various academic disciplines and industry sectors. Its primary use cases in academic literature can be categorized into three major domains:
- Organizational resilience and crisis management: Scholars have extensively utilized BMST to analyze the vulnerability of established enterprises to sudden exogenous shocks and contingencies.[4] Following global supply chain disruptions and the COVID-19 pandemic, the framework proved critical for maintaining business continuity and helping companies increase their adaptability under extreme pressure.[5][6]
- Sustainable and circular economy: The method is frequently applied to evaluate the long-term viability of novel, sustainability-driven business models against regulatory risks and resource constraints. It has been used to assess everything from the resilience of sustainable business models in the energy sector to emerging agricultural markets, such as insect production for food and feed in Europe.[7][8]
- Digital transformation: BMST serves as a foundational tool for assessing how traditional businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), can withstand technological disruption. Research has demonstrated that applying BMST principles significantly improves the performance and survival rate of SMEs undergoing digital transformation.[9] Furthermore, its underlying principles have been extended to broader organizational domains, such as proposals for "organizational stress tests" in quality-management auditing.[10]
References
edit- 1 2 3 4 Haaker, T.; Bouwman, H.; Janssen, W.; de Reuver, M. (2017). "Business model stress testing: A practical approach to test the robustness of a business model". Futures 89: 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.04.003.
- 1 2 Bouwman, H.; Heikkilä, J.; Heikkilä, M.; Leopold, C.; Haaker, T. (2018). "Achieving agility using business model stress testing". Electronic Markets 28 (2): 149–162. doi:10.1007/s12525-016-0243-0.
- 1 2 Heim, Lars (2025). Mastering Business Model Stress Testing: Navigating Megatrends and Market Dynamics Through Strategic Analysis and Innovation. Future of Business and Finance. Springer. English translation of the German edition: Heim, Lars (2025). Zukunftsfähigkeit durch Business Model Stress Testing. Springer Gabler. ISBN 978-3-658-49421-6. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-49422-3.
- ↑ Niemimaa, M.; Järveläinen, J.; Heikkilä, M.; Heikkilä, J. (2019). "Business continuity of business models: Evaluating the resilience of business models for contingencies". International Journal of Information Management 49: 208-216.
- ↑ Margherita, A.; Heikkilä, M. (2021). "Business continuity in the COVID-19 emergency: A framework of actions undertaken by world-leading companies". Business Horizons 64 (5): 683-695.
- ↑ Eriksson, T.; Heikkilä, M.; Nummela, N. (2022). "Business model innovation for resilient international growth". Small Enterprise Research 29 (2): 205–226. doi:10.1080/13215906.2022.2092890.
- ↑ Leisen, R.; Steffen, B.; Weber, C. (2019). "Regulatory risk and the resilience of new sustainable business models in the energy sector". Journal of Cleaner Production 219: 865-878.
- ↑ Niyonsaba, H. H.; Höhler, J.; Rumpold, B. A.; Van der Fels-Klerx, H. J.; Meuwissen, M. P. M. (2024). "Robustness of business models for insect production for feed and food in Europe". Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (Brill): 1–18. doi:10.1163/23524588-00001141.
- ↑ Bouwman, H.; Nikou, S.; de Reuver, M. (2019). "Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs?". Telecommunications Policy 43 (9).
- ↑ Bacoup, P. et al. (2024). "Organizational Stress Test: A New and Complementary Vision for the Auditing of Quality Management Systems". Journal of Engineering (Wiley). doi:10.1155/je/3879910.