Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Featured picture candidates

(Redirected from FPC)
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them.

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. They should be added by, or at the request of, the nominator.

An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== [[File:Foo.jpg|300px]] *{{info}} A short description.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
Shortcut

File:Etna Southeast Crater eruption 2022-05-17.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 21:55:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Casa Batló Barcelona May 2026-7.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 21:25:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Bicycle in the Meuse River Maastricht.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 20:38:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Busy Morning - local street vendor in Zejtun.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 19:15:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Vernal Hanging-Parrot in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 17:38:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Butorides striata in Bosque Alemao.jpg

Voting period ends on Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:56:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Amazonian landmine.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 12:44:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thanks Wilfredor, I did the process again (high pass filter) saving with metadatas and next apply compression without loss of quality --Ezarateesteban 13:40, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Now why the image occupies less space than the original?, I would kindly suggest that any edits to other users’ photographs be made in a separate new file, with a detailed description of the changes and clear attribution to the original author. That said, in my view, editing a photograph that is already QI and used in a Wiki entry—especially one in which I am also involved on Wiki Love Earth not be the most appropriate approach. I believe it would be better to preserve the original file and upload any modified version separately. Wilfredor (talk) 14:15, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
See history, my edit was considered QI --Ezarateesteban 14:20, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please upload your version in another file, It's also a way of respecting the author Wilfredor (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Renamed --Ezarateesteban 17:42, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shivalik Hills from Sukhna Lake in Chandigarh, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 09:43:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Champ d'Orge carrée (Hordeum vulgare).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2026 at 07:26:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:20260510 Monroe NZ92637.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 19:34:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Shah Tahmasp I (1514-1576) in a landscape (painted circa 1575).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 17:20:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Entre montanhas - VI Encontro Fotográfico - Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais - 2010-05-22.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 17:14:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Cathedral Saint-Vincent-de-Paul in Tunis.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 16:06:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Santa Maria del Mar Barcelona September 2026-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 12:12:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 I withdraw my nomination You are right, of course! Conditions were very difficult and I had no tripode. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Giovanni Latrano May 2022-22.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 11:05:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:"Zerynthia polyxena".jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 11:00:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 107.png

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 07:32:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Zaaddozen Helleborus orientalis 19-05-2026 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 04:34:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:86 Yak 11 N5943 Czech Mate 2014 gold heat photo D Ramey Logan.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2026 at 03:13:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Udu lahkub järvelt.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 21:24:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Male Red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 21:16:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:De Cocksdorp (NL), Leuchtturm -- 2026 -- 0305.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 20:28:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Personally I really like the shadows and probably wouldn't have nominated the picture without the contrast they provide between the two halves of the path, but I can understand the low-wow-factor type oppose, I did wonder if people would think this. Cmao20 (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lémur negro (Eulemur macaco), Isla de los Lemures, Madagascar, 2025-09-17, DD 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 19:31:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Ceriagrion coromandelianum male 27052014 (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 15:09:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Diplacodes trivialis female 11 09 2014.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 14:57:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Old Jewish Clock.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 11:29:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Horology
  •  Info Old Jewish clock, The Great Synagogue - Hungarian Jewish Museum, Budapest, Hungary - all by Krigore (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Krigore (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Looks very good in thumbnail and is a beautiful motif. But imho the level of detail and the leck of consistent sharpness are not sufficient for a pro vote. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:39, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! Yes, I really like this clock! If the photo doesn't get nominated this time, maybe I'll be able to photograph it again someday. It's definitely worth the FP as an object. Krigore (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry, the subject is great but I don't think this level of detail and sharpness is enough considering the relatively low resolution. I am also not usually convinced by the cut-out-and-stick-on-a-white-background approach. Cmao20 (talk) 20:31, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! I added it because I really like this photo — but well, in my opinion, the quality is borderline. Unfortunately, the camera equipment was good for the time, but well, that was a while ago. As for the background — I don't really like cutouts either, but here, there was a rather odd-looking square in the background; I think it's better now. Anyway, take a look at the file history and you'll see what I mean. Krigore (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I concur with Cmao20. The editing in some bordering areas could also be better. Furthermore the item is distorted and would have benefited from a PC or a different POV Poco a poco (talk) 11:44, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:087 Male Snail kite in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 10:44:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:181 Chestnut-bellied guan in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 10:41:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:At Paranapiacaba 2023 079 - Armstrong Whitworth braking locomotives.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 09:34:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Wernigerode - Kochstraße 43 - Kleinstes Haus 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 08:14:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Amazon River ESA17276564.tiff

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2026 at 04:38:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Moscow - 2026 - Paeonia 'Amabilis'.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 23:32:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Red fox catches a vole - Tolyatti, Russia.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 18:41:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Hestnut-tailed starling (Sturnia malabarica) in Bangladesh.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 17:16:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:A Common kingfisher is taking a bath.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 16:30:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Cicada-Sitia-Lasithi-Crete-Greece.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 14:22:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Iridescent plieus clouds.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 12:37:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Megastar Chiranjeevi.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 11:39:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Harvest Mouse and Spring Blossom.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 11:23:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Смоларски манастир 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 10:18:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Yes, it’s possible that there are towels and sticharions that were used in the baptist ceremony. I think it’s more a tradition to hung them on the door than it’s an efficient method to dry them out. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Éristale gluante (Eristalis tenax) - Ver à queue de rat.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 07:18:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Crested guan (Penelope purpurascens aequatorialis) Paz de las Aves.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2026 at 03:07:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Gecko diurno grande de Madagascar (Phelsuma grandis), Nosy Komba, Madagascar, 2025-09-12, DD 30.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 21:06:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Barrage Malleg.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 20:03:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Great crested grebes (Podiceps cristatus) juvenile with adult Haff Reimech 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 18:45:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Common mormon (Papilio polytes pasikrates) female form stichius on citrus blossom Shuangyu.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 18:43:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:ইজতেমায় একসাথে প্রার্থনায় লাখো মুসল্লি.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 18:06:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Durmitor Sedlo Pass - 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 15:51:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Erythromma Lindenii.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 09:24:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Collines Parc National de Bouhedma.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 09:06:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Black-winged Stilt in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary November 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 07:04:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Kop-hals-rompboerderij (Tjepma state) Overijsselsestraatweg 22, Reduzum. 23-03-2026. (actm.) 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 04:21:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Note: It would be better if you added that, in your opinion, it is nothing special. Your opinion is not a "dogma". After all, I find the lighting and the atmosphere of this photo special.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info I didn't mean to be disrespectful or impose my opinion as dogmatic. As I have often explained in the many years spent here, for me the default state of a candidate is "not promoted". An image should be recognized as worth of a FP star not because it lacks obvious flaws, but due to its extraordinary qualities or value. That is why I consider more important to justify a support than an oppose vote. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:40, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:2026-04-04 Z5-3850E Achim-Lammerts Ophiocordyceps-gracilis.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 03:29:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Others
  •  Info Macro photograph of the entomopathogenic "Zombie fungus" (Paraisaria gracilis, syn. Ophiocordyceps gracilis) growing from mossy soil in the alluvial forest of the "Hördter Rheinaue" nature reserve. Created, uploaded and nominated me -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Abstain as author. This photograph of a ‘zombie mushroom’ is like winning the lottery. Not because the mushroom is extremely rare, but because its tiny size makes it very difficult to find. That is why we have very few photographs of this species in our collection – an no FPs of this taxonomic order. I spotted it in the moss whilst searching for morels. The spore-bearing structure measures only about 5 mm; the focus series was taken at approximately a 1:1 scale. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I like the composition, the lighting and the colors. I can nearly smell the wet forest floor. Nice! --Granada (talk) 05:12, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment With this type of file name you may lead people to believe Achim-Lammerts is some part of a scientific name. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I don’t think that’s the situation, Charles. It is quite common practice for file names to include the date, camera model, image number and author. Or do people actually believe that, for example, ‘IMG_0815’ is part of the taxonomic classification? That said, I don’t understand why, after 20 years, this software is still unable to distinguish a file’s title from its image filename. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 12:38, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support but I agree with Charles. It should be renamed. Yann (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support But, please fix the name --Wilfredor (talk) 13:21, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Yann, @Wilfredor: Thank you very much for your review. Does the author’s name in the title only bother you in my case, or does it also bother you as well, for example, in the posts by Tisha Mukherjee, Giles Laurent and Don Ramey Logan? Shouldn’t we then remove the authors’ names from all files? Why hasn’t this bothered you before, even in my nominations?
    The naming convention complies with the guidelines; it includes, for example, the correct taxonomic name or the location where the photo was taken, as well as the date taken and the catalogue number to distinguish it from other images on the same subject (file names must be unique). Furthermore, the name should be kept short, which is why I avoid prefixes such as ‘Photo by’. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    There's no rule requiring a specific format for file names, just a general practice you can see in other nominated photos. So the file name alone shouldn't be a valid reason to oppose.
    Most of this information already exists elsewhere anyway. The date is usually in the image description, the author can be indicated there too, and the camera data is in the EXIF at the bottom of the page. Apart from the main subject, everything else in the file name is redundant.
    Redundancy isn't necessarily noise, though. When a name ends with "by ...", anyone understands that person is the author. The problem is when the name starts with something like "2026-04-04 Z5-3850E". First you have to figure out if the date is YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-DD-MM. Then what "Z5" means — I happen to know it's a camera model, but not everyone does. And "3850E" looks like a sequence number or internal code, which isn't obvious either. Putting all of that at the beginning, before the actual subject, is what creates noise: the reader has to decode several things before getting to what the photo is about. Same with "Achim-Lammerts" appearing before the subject without "by" — someone could read it as part of the subject's name, the name of a mushroom species for example. So I'm not objecting to including extra information. I'm objecting to placing it where it makes the name harder to read and easy to misread. A clear name puts the subject first and leaves the author, date, camera or internal codes where they don't get in the way. Wilfredor (talk) 14:18, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I know what you mean, and that’s why I find it annoying that the file title has to be tied to the filename. For me, this naming convention offers huge advantages when it comes to organizing my archive, as it allows me to sort images into overviews directly within the file system. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    It would be good to report what you're saying on Phabricator; it would really improve image readability. Wilfredor (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment I have for many years always tried to use "Subject" "Location" "Author" เก my file names. By including Author, it makes the user think twice before publishing the work without proper attribution. Don (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don’t think the title is ambiguous in this case, nor is it in any of my other 800 contributions. That’s never been a problem when I’ve posted my botany photos on FP. The image is currently being assessed by WLE 2026, and I don’t want to disrupt that process anyway. For future contributions, I will adjust the naming convention I use to "Theme or subject at location (Date Catalogue Author).jpg" like other contributors do. Would that be alright for now? --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ipswich Savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis princeps) on the jetty at Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, USA.png

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2026 at 01:29:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2026 at 20:21:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2026 at 20:25:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Band playing for the day Jesus of Mercy 03.jpg

Voting period ends on Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:13:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Gołąb okularowy – Speckled pigeon – Columba guinea.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2026 at 16:31:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Chor Minor mosque, Bukhara (Чор-Минор, Бухара).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2026 at 18:17:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Church of the Nativity of the Theotokos (Vladykino), Moscow - 2026-6.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2026 at 17:37:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Stari most pri Brežicah (Old Bridge at Brežice, Slovenia).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2026 at 13:13:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •  Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 16:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose Sorry but I miss an outstanding composition here. Very high quality but I feel like I neither get a good idea of how the bridge looks (because the shooting position is too close to the bridge itself) nor do I get any interesting abstract forms. I am aware this picture is objectively strong in quality terms, and I will withdraw my vote if I'm the only person blocking a five day promotion. Cmao20 (talk) 03:11, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info @Wilfredor I used 1st Hi-Res in 2021 here [1], i think Olympus made first handheld option too. Used in cameras which got in-body Sensor Shift in (sensor optical stabilization), cams with IS in lens couldnt use it. Here is from hand (50 Mpx), from tripod you can have (80Mpx). Isnt same as using camera with that pixelage, but got close, dynamic range is also biger up to FF level. @Cmao20 OK, i just think compo is perfect here. I got more view-compos of it, just bridge this was my choice. I am editing one with town too, but thats different. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Further proof that size doesn't matter Wilfredor (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Sattriya dancer performing the dance form in Assam, India1.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2026 at 16:11:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Dromedary and its camel driver.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2026 at 09:05:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Houses Fields Kundakh Mandi Mar26 A7CR 10628.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2026 at 03:23:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 640 - Zingiber spectabile.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2026 at 20:20:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Caldera de las Cañadas 2023-12-27.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2026 at 10:16:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Partie Humide Radès Méliane.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2026 at 06:21:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Fri 12 Jun → Wed 17 Jun
Sat 13 Jun → Thu 18 Jun
Sun 14 Jun → Fri 19 Jun
Mon 15 Jun → Sat 20 Jun
Tue 16 Jun → Sun 21 Jun
Wed 17 Jun → Mon 22 Jun

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Mon 08 Jun → Wed 17 Jun
Tue 09 Jun → Thu 18 Jun
Wed 10 Jun → Fri 19 Jun
Thu 11 Jun → Sat 20 Jun
Fri 12 Jun → Sun 21 Jun
Sat 13 Jun → Mon 22 Jun
Sun 14 Jun → Tue 23 Jun
Mon 15 Jun → Wed 24 Jun
Tue 16 Jun → Thu 25 Jun
Wed 17 Jun → Fri 26 Jun

Closing nominations manually

The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
    • Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
      {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
      (You can leave the gallery parameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add the alternative=xxx parameter with the name of the selected image between the gallery and the sig parameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.)
    • Edit the title of the nomination and add featured or not featured after the link – for example:
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
      becomes
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
    • Save your edit.
  2. If it is featured:
    1. Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    2. Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
    3. Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}} You also need the com-nom parameter if the image gets renamed.
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance, {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    4. Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
    5. Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
      File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.)
      • The Title should be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg).
      • The x in {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}} should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively.
      • If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
        File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
        Replace the Z in (Z files) by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead of File:xxxxx.jpg and for the title.
    6. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    7. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    8. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a <noinclude>...</noinclude> section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:
    1. A category for the month and year, like Category:June 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
    2. A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
    3. A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
    4. If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
  4. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
    • To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
    • Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}} or: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}.
    • Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.

Closing a delisting nomination

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
    {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
  2. Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add delisted or not delisted after the image title; for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
  4. Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
  5. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
  6. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Archiving a withdrawn nomination

If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1190052133"