This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting.
Please propose new stub templates and categories here before creation.
Please propose new stub templates and categories here before creation.
This category is for stub articles relating to case law in New Zealand. You can help by expanding them.
To add an article to this category, use
To add an article to this category, use
{{NewZealand-case-law-stub}} instead of {{stub}}.Pages in category "New Zealand case law stubs"
The following 169 pages are in this category, out of 169 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
A
- A M Bisley & Co Ltd v Thompson
- Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co
- Ansley v Prospectus Nominees Unlimited
- Aotearoa International Ltd v Scancarriers A/S
- ASB Bank Ltd v Harlick
- Attorney-General v Barker Bros Ltd
- Attorney-General v Rutherford
- Auckland Harbour Board v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
- Austin Nichols & Co Inc v Stichting Lodestar
- Autex Industries Ltd v Auckland City Council
- Awa v Independent News Auckland Ltd
B
- Balfour v Attorney-General
- Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation
- Bank of New Zealand v Greenwood
- Barrett v IBC International Ltd
- Bayley v Public Trustee
- Bell-Booth Group Ltd v Attorney-General
- Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd
- Bird v Bicknell
- BONZ Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke
- Bowen v Paramount Builders (Hamilton) Ltd
- Boyd Knight v Purdue
- Boyd v Mayor of Wellington
- Bradley West Solicitors Nominee Co Ltd v Keeman
- Brown & Doherty Ltd v Whangarei County Council
- Brown v Brown
- Brown v Heathcote County Council
- Brown v Langwoods Photo Stores Ltd
- Buhrer v Tweedie
- Burbery Mortgage Finance & Savings Ltd v Hindsbank Holdings Ltd
C
- Carey v Hastie
- Carrigan v Redwood
- Caruthers v Whitaker
- Catley v Herbert
- Chatfield v Jones
- Clasper v Lawrence
- Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Challenge Corp Ltd
- Compcorp Ltd v Force Entertainment Ltd
- Connor v Pukerau Store Ltd
- Cook Islands Shipping Co Ltd v Colson Builders Ltd
- Cox & Coxon Ltd v Leipst
- Cross v Aurora Group Ltd
- Cuff v Broadlands Finance Ltd
D
F
G
H
J
M
- MacIndoe v Mainzeal Group Ltd
- Mall Finance & Investment Co Ltd v Slater
- Mayfair Ltd v Pears
- McCarthy v Wellington City
- McDonald v Attorney-General
- McElroy Milne v Commercial Electronics Ltd
- McKinlay Hendry Ltd v Tonkin & Taylor Ltd
- McLaren Maycroft & Co v Fletcher Development Co Ltd
- McLaren v McLaren
- McMahon v Gilberd and Co Ltd
- Meates v Attorney-General
- Mechenex Pacific Services Ltd v TCA Airconditioning (New Zealand) Ltd
- Mercurius Ventures Ltd v Waitakere City Council
- Midland Metals Overseas Pte Ltd v The Christchurch Press Co Ltd
- Moffat v Moffat
- Money v Ven-Lu-Ree Ltd
- Morrison v Upper Hutt City Council
- Mouat v Clark Boyce
- Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson
N
P
- Parker v Small Smith
- Pendergast v Attorney-General
- Pharmacy Care Systems Ltd v Attorney-General
- Phillips v Phillips
- Powierza v Daley
- Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerston North City Council
- Pratt Contractors Ltd v Transit New Zealand
- Price v Sports Marine Ltd
- Price Waterhouse v Kwan
- Provost Developments Ltd v Collingwood Towers Ltd
R
- R M Turton & Co (in liq) v Kerslake & Partners
- R v Attorney General for England and Wales
- Re AIC Merchant Finance Ltd (in rec)
- Re Amelia Bullock-Webster
- Re Budge
- Re Karsten (Deceased)
- Rees v Sinclair
- Richards v Murgatroyd
- Riddell v Porteous
- Rolls-Royce New Zealand Ltd v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd
- Ross v Henderson
S
- Saunderson v Purchase
- Schmidt v Holland
- Scott Group Ltd v McFarlane
- Scott v Wise
- Sew Hoy & Sons Ltd (in liq and in rec) v Coopers & Lybrand
- SGS (New Zealand) Ltd v Quirke Export Ltd
- Shattock v Devlin
- Simanke v Liu
- Slater Wilmhurst Ltd v Crown Group Custodian Ltd
- South Pacific Manufacturing Co Ltd v New Zealand Security Consultants & Investigations Ltd
- Starlight Enterprises Ltd v Lapco Enterprises Ltd
- Stieller v Porirua City Council
- Stringer v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co