The Zacatec language is an extinct and poorly attested language,[1] likely of the Uto-Aztecan language family. It has been suspected to be a Nahuan language,[2] or to be close to Huichol.[3]
| Zacatec | |
|---|---|
| Zacateco | |
| zʼapa | |
| Native to | Mexico |
| Region | Zacatecas, Durango |
| Ethnicity | Zacateco |
| Extinct | (date missing) |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | None (mis) |
| Glottolog | None |
Territory of the Zacatecs | |
Vocabulary
editIn 1940, Pedro Hendrichs recorded a short vocabulary of an uncertain language from two travelling musicians, who said they were from Peña Colorada, Zacatecas. The vocabulary bears similarities to Huichol, though the musicians called the language Zacatec and affirmed that it was distinct from Huichol, Cora, Tepehuan and Nahuatl. Howard F. Cline hypothesized that this vocabulary represents a remnant of the Guachichil language or another regional language rather than the language of the historical Zacatec tribe.[2] Wick R. Miller hypothesised that the language recorded could have really been Huichol instead of the Zacatec language, noting that "it seems odd that the language would surface after 400 years, with no reports in between, so far as I am aware".[2]
| gloss | Zacatec |
|---|---|
| name of the language | zʼapa |
| body | kuʼāza |
| nose | ʔzʼuri |
| mouth | tʼēni |
| bone | umʼɛ |
| rabbit | tʼaču |
| moon | mʼɛȼə |
| corn | iʔkꞌuʔ |
| metate | mat́aʔ |
| tortilla | paʔᵃpʼa |
References
edit- ↑ "Dialectos del mexicano". www.cervantesvirtual.com. Retrieved 2025-03-23.
- 1 2 3 Harvey, H. R. (1972-12-31), Wauchope, Robert; Cline, Howard F. (eds.), "7. The Relaciones Geográficas, 1579—1586: Native Languages", Handbook of Middle American Indians, Volume 12, University of Texas Press, pp. 279–323, doi:10.7560/701526-011, ISBN 978-1-4773-0681-9, retrieved 2025-03-23
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link) - ↑ Miller, Wick R. (July 1983). "A Note on Extinct Languages of Northwest Mexico of Supposed Uto-Aztecan Affiliation". International Journal of American Linguistics. 49 (3): 328–334. doi:10.1086/465793. ISSN 0020-7071.