Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology

  Main Talk Article guide Article alerts Assessment Popular pages Recognized content Resources 

Index · Statistics · Log

Psychology articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA	1	5	5	12			23
FL			1	1			2
GA	3	16	27	70		12	128
B	33	212	349	371		131	1,096
C	31	343	1,143	2,184	1	568	4,270
Start	6	163	849	3,455		2,399	6,872
Stub		4	112	1,307		1,903	3,326
List	7	11	55	108	1	14	196
Category					3,125		3,125
Disambig					33		33
File					83		83
Portal					100		100
Project					23		23
Template					237		237
NA		9	50	198	833		1,090
Other				3	184		187
Assessed	81	763	2,591	7,709	4,620	5,027	20,791
Unassessed			1	8		249	258
Total	81	763	2,592	7,717	4,620	5,276	21,049
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 74,940			Ω = 4.77

COI edit request relevant to this project: Nonverbal communication

Just notifying members of this project that there is a Conflict of Interest edit request relevant to this WikiProject at the Nonverbal communication article. DrThneed (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Deese

The article James Deese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 20+ years, GNG, NPOV, written like a resume or obituary

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 01:18, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Looking for feedback on draft sources

Hello!

I am looking for help with and feedback on the references for Draft:Reality shifting. The submission was declined due to poor sourcing, but I don't quite understand why. The reviewer only pointed out some source-related phrasing issues, and never clarified when I asked.

It's a niche topic, and I'm not an expert at searching for these kinds of sources, so I was only able to find one really good scientific article. However, I used several other articles from reputable sources throughout the draft.

My main question is; are there not enough quality sources, or is it that I am misusing them?

I would appreciate any advice. I brought this to this WikiProject as per the draft tophat, and because this is a medicine-related article and so the requirements for referencing are different/stricter.

Stormdew (talk) 07:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Solomon Asch

Solomon Asch has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed du, ring the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

After seeing this note, I decided to edit the article about Solomon Asch, but to edit it a little at a time. I am traveling. I thought some of the text was awkward and hope that my edits made the text more straightforward. I will return to it a little at a time. Iss246 (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Conscience

Conscience has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Category:Oneirologists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Oneirologists has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

There is an intractable dispute between me and another user about the definition of oneirology, which is necessary to resolve the outcome. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:03, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Children in the military#Requested move 10 April 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Children in the military#Requested move 10 April 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it • talk • edits) 01:07, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that Rainmaking (ritual), which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 April 2026 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

Developmental profile

Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 17:23, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Bibliophobia could use a third opinion

Large addition, reverted, restored. Arguments are on talk and in the edit summaries. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:02, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of suicides § RfC: Should "List of suicides" be split into chronological subarticles?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of suicides § RfC: Should "List of suicides" be split into chronological subarticles?.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 04:47, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Original research in Human mating strategies article

Discussion on potential original research in the Human mating strategies article. Discussion here: Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard --Woofboy (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, this is a better link to the discussion: Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Human_mating_stratedies (forgive the typo!) :D --Woofboy (talk) 16:35, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Video Game Addiction#Epidemiology

I'd like a second opinion on an article; I'm currently revising the section Video Game Addiction#Epidemiology. I've already discussed with someone else that the information about the moderators is too detailed. Should the prevalence figures therefore be reduced to the pooled global prevalence with the deviation and simply listed at the beginning in the banner?
In what cases should there be a separate section on prevalence/epidemiology, since only moderators (variables that influence the preverlance) and mediators (variables explaining why its higher or lower in some chases) would be listed there anyway? The Other Karma (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Rainmaking (ritual)#Requested move 14 April 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rainmaking (ritual)#Requested move 14 April 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 03:30, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

FAC of Well-being

The article Well-being is currently a candidate for featured article status. It hasn't received much feedback so far, so comments and reviews are appreciated at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Well-being/archive1. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:19, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

David B. Feldman

My hope is that someone will add secondary sources to this article. I will show gratitude. Bearian (talk) 04:27, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder#Requested move 25 May 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder#Requested move 25 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 08:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)