Wikipedia talk:Featured lists

Increasing number of TFLs per week

I was wondering... if we have ~3,397 lists as featured lists that have not appeared on the main page, in other words, as TFLs, does this not mean we can actually increase the number of times we have FLs appear on the main page per week to 3 or 4 as opposed to the status-quo 2? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Given that the last year has seen an average monthly increase of about 20 FLs (so ~4-5 a week), running 3-4 lists a week would be sustainable (i.e., we wouldn't be burning through TFLs faster than we're adding them). However, this would have to be discussed in a broader forum. I think 3 days a week is an easier pitch because it's easy to add Wednesday to the Monday/Friday schedule. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

@RunningTiger123 Yeah, your perspective is exactly mine. Which venue would that be? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:50, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Probably Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals), though there's not much point unless you get the agreement of Giants2008, who actually does the scheduling work. --PresN 11:31, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

@PresN I was going to further mention that one of the current FLC delegates could be designated (by Giants2008?) to assist him with the scheduling. Say, you or Josh, anyone who is able to. Does that make sense? I didn't bother pinging Giants2008 because I thought your message above must have pinged him.Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:15, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:10, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

• Maybe you should go to every other day and leave them up for 2 days. Every list would have equal time.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  My suspicion is WP:POTD would not like being permanently pushed lower on the page (as opposed to essentially rotating spots with TFL), especially if it's just to run the same content longer instead of running new content every day. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

January 15, 2026 25th anniversary of WP

I've been seeing if people are planning any special observances for the 25th anniversary of WP. I started here and then discussion moved to here. I imagine WP:DYK, WP:TFA, WP:TFP (and maybe WP:TFL) might want to try to plan something. There are 3 months to figure things out. Feel free to comment there or have your own discussion.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposal) has an RfC

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposal) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:50, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

The RfC has been closed; see Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list#Increase frequency of TFLs for discussion of how to implement the consensus. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:51, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2026

I am wishing to contribute for this page. is possible to allow me to edit the page.so it will be kept updated Abijithkumar2025 (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 05:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

NOTSTATS

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Proposal: Amend WP:NOTSTATS and WP:NLIST to strengthen the case against indiscriminate use of statistics. WhatamIdoing (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2026 (UTC)