I am nominating this article for review because the defense of section is problematic in several ways:
- it has NPOV issues
- it does not explain the reasoning, references, or thinkers who defend heteronormativity
- it requires prior knowledge about a celebrity "scandal" in order to be understood
- it does not engage the material in an academic manner, which is important, being that heteronormativity is an academic construct
- it does not cite appropriate sources
In addition, the section is poorly written.
Jmsast 20:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Your nomination appears to imply you will not be working on the article. Do you yourself intend to address concerns, or someone on the article? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]