Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Needle Galaxy 4565.jpeg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2013 at 12:11:43 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Herald talk with me 12:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --'''Johncy''' (talk) 15:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Low resolution, questionable licensing- it's been nominated for deletion. J Milburn (talk) 16:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think 2,048 × 1,937 pixels is a low resolution.. Thanks..Herald talk with me 16:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consider for a second how big the subject is, and then compare it to our other space photography. J Milburn (talk) 10:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a higher resolution copy of the image...Herald talk with me 13:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ - For a space photograph that is quite low resolution. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a higher resolution copy of the image...Herald talk with me 13:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the license on this higher resolution image? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:56, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been a new OTRS ticket? Discussion here seems to point to higher resolution images not necessarily falling under the CC license. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, done it. now the author have given copyright status to all the versions of the picture. Herald talk with me 15:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support for a non-NASA image that's already quite a solid size now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support since the above problems have been rectified. - Jayadevp13 14:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]