Muzilon

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Riethmaier has been accepted

Gregory Riethmaier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:William Anderson (philosopher)

Hello, Muzilon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Anderson (philosopher), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Last Summer (1969 film), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q&A was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Walter Richard Cassels.jpg

Hi Muzilon. I suggest you ask about File:Walter Richard Cassels.jpg at c:COM:VPC and maybe also take a look at the Wikipedia articlea copyfraud and National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute because I'm fairly certain that any claim of copyright authorship by the NPG for a photo taken by someone who died more than 100 years ago is just the NPG try to claim a right that courts in the UK have ruled that it doesn't have. Commons doesn't seem to have any problems hosting files like this despite the NPG's claim. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Yeah, I'm aware of the Wikimedia vs NPG dispute. However, I note that COM:LICENSE also says If material that has been saved from a third-party website is uploaded to Commons, the copyright laws of the U.S., the country of residence of the uploader, and the country of location of the web servers of the website apply. Now, I don't live in the US or UK, and have no idea whether my country allows sweat of the brow copyright claims as asserted by the NPG, so I just went with Fair Use. If another editor wants to upload it to Commons, on their head be it. :) Muzilon (talk) 09:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Just for reference, I asked about this at c:COM:VPC#National Portrait Gallery sourced photo from 1863. Moreover, I understand you being concerned about this, but again I think it should be OK. The problem with uploading the file as non-free is that, if discussed at FFD, it would likely be seen as failing WP:NFCC#1 (WP:FREER) and end up deleted because someone could upload the same photo to Commons as PD, even if you don't want to do so yourself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:12, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Actually, that's precisely what happened when I uploaded a photo of Nancy Hsueh as "Fair Use", so it wouldn't bother me if the same thing happened with Cassels. Muzilon (talk) 12:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@Muzilon, I've moved the file to commons along with it's history (File name wasn't changed). Also tagged the current enwiki file for deletion.––KEmel49(📝,📋) 19:56, 16 May 2026 (UTC)