I am contesting the proposed deletion of Workforce.com as I believe it meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for organizations (WP:ORGCRIT).
While I acknowledge concerns about sourcing, Workforce.com is an established company in workforce management with significant industry presence. I am actively working on improving the article by adding reliable, independent sources that demonstrate coverage and expanding the content to provide a more neutral, well-rounded view.
If there are specific concerns about the article’s content or sourcing, I welcome constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement rather than deletion.
Would it be possible to allow time for these updates before proceeding with deletion? JDatWF (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Hi @JDatWF, I put up the proposed deletion tag because, following a thorough search, I could not find any sources that met all the notability criteria. Mentions of the company I found online were simple listings (WP:ORGTRIV) or not independent (WP:DEPENDENTCOVERAGE). If you can find sources that do meet the notability criteria, reply to me on this talk page. I think a week is ample time to add these sources to the article, but if notability isn't established past that, I will list the article at articles for deletion. 📻NuclearSpuds🎙️ 09:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Hi @JDatWF, I just looked through the article and it looks well-referenced enough to meet notability so I will stop considering it for deletion. 📻NuclearSpuds🎙️ 06:37, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply