| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wayback Machine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine
edithttps://www.topspeed.com/ ..."SEO bait" content?
I have seen others. Should there be a list article?
Piñanana (talk) 19:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- If you can't get independent third-party sources discussing websites excluded by Wayback Machine, then it is not noteworthy. Also, these questions belong to the WP:Reference desk. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- search: excluded from the Wayback Machine
- https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/List_of_websites_excluded_from_the_Wayback_Machine/Partial_exclusions
- Piñanana (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- WP:Tertiary sources. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- And once again, this page is not the place to discuss this. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Too Many Requests error
edit"429 Too Many Requests nginx". This error appears every time i open up Web Archive since past month. Do you also see it? --~2025-31413-92 (talk) 11:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Its down
editcan someone tell me why its down? TVShowsFan2005 (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- maybe ask someone ~2026-10292-14 (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- WP:FORUM | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 18:46, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Oldest Archive
editI found early archives on the wayback machine and even a thread where users discussed old finds. I cited both in the article text currently citations 8 and 9. However per Help:CS1 errors the citations linked for the oldest archive will always be invalid due to the rules of Help:Citation Style 1. The current citation has an error for a malformed timestamp on the archive url. Just something I thought I would point out and put here on the talk page so that the article content does not get removed without reason. Let me know your thoughts and if you can find an older archive than the BBC web server page 1995 on the wayback machine.
year is earlier than archiver launch date of
- 1996 for archive.org
please update to include Wired story
edithttps://www.wired.com/story/the-internets-most-powerful-archiving-tool-is-in-mortal-peril/ ~2026-17275-51 (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Not done: according to the page's protection level, you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:13, 14 April 2026 (UTC)