Talk:Trondheim Airport

(Redirected from Talk:Trondheim Airport, Værnes)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleTrondheim Airport was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 13, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Requested move 10 May 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


Trondheim Airport, VærnesTrondheim Airport – Official name as per Avinor's website and the convensional name. ᴛʜᴇMᴀɴLK (Talk) 10:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)  Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 11:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Relisting. 何をしましたか?那晚安啦。 07:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Norway has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Aviation has been notified of this discussion. 何をしましたか?那晚安啦。 07:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Airports has been notified of this discussion. Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Move - Unless there is more than one location going by these names, the local place name is redundant and makes it harder, not easier to find the page. If there are more than one, then the bare name should be the current or most recent location. Always, simplest is best with page names. 130.226.161.50 (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to the "needs updating" orange banners in the article. Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Article is very out of date. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article has two "update needed" banners to be resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.