Talk:Severn Beach line/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Prose isn't too bad. Make sure years are not linked per MOS:UNLINKYEARS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Here's where the real problem is. The majority of the article is unsourced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The biggest problem is the lack of references. Because of this, I'm afraid I'm going to have to fail the article. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 19:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)