This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsVisual arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Latest comment: 7 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
AS a Frenchman (please see my user-page) and one of the specialists of typography on French Wikipedia (please see ), I disagree because this last remark is very often wrong: French typography is much more complex, please read fr:WP:TYPO and specifically that section (fr:WP:TYPO#MAJUSCULES-MUSÉES), you notably will see similar examples: «le musée des Arts et Traditions populaires, le musée national d’Art moderne, le musée de l’Homme ». If you need a link with the works of a serious man whose job was that of typography, I am available for that: the other serious references used in fr:WP:TYPO#MAJUSCULES-MUSÉES are that of books, not available on line. By the way, many newspapers, except Le Monde are not very good with perfect typography. --Gkml (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply P.-S.: as a record, in a French sentence, you would write « le musée de la Vie romantique». Regards. --Gkml (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
