Talk:Lost season 4
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lost season 4 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Lost season 4 was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orphaned references in Lost (season 4)
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Lost (season 4)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "LATimes":
- From Ben Linus: Denise Martin (September 17, 2008). "Michael Emerson's 'Lost' world". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved on September 30, 2008.
- From Lost (season 5): Fernandez, Maria Elena (January 11, 2009). "Spring TV Previews: Lost". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 11, 2009.
{{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=(help)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editGA review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lost season 4/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Igordebraga (talk · contribs) 05:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Olliefant (talk · contribs) 06:01, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Hey, while I appereciate the speed at which you've tried to get this promoted (I was planning on fixing it myself) unfortunately I'm going to quick fail this nomination, it's not close to meeting the GA criteria in this state. Its filled with MOS:VIOLATIONS, unsourced info, lacking info, poor formatting, NFCC violations, and other issues which could not be addressed within a reasonable time. Additionally, from what I can tell you haven't done significant effort to this page or gotten a sign off from someone who has so this would be considered a drive by nomination. That being said, like I stated I planned to take up this article myself and work out the errors. If you would be willing to fix the issues on the page, I would be interested in co-nominating it for GA at some point in the future. Olliefant (she/her) 06:01, 2 April 2026 (UTC)