Talk:List of generation III Pokémon
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Arenghtqru888 in topic WHY DOES RAYQUAZA NOT HAVE HIS OWN PAGE???
 | Absol was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 11 September 2025 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of generation III Pokémon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "List of generation III Pokémon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
| Blaziken was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 28 July 2021 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| Deoxys was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 18 July 2021 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of generation III Pokémon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "List of generation III Pokémon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 22 December 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to List of Generation III Pokémon. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
WHY DOES RAYQUAZA NOT HAVE HIS OWN PAGE???
editHE IS ONE OF THE MOST FAMOUS POKÉMON OF ALL TIME AND IS THE MASCOT OF POKÉMON EMERALD. GIVE HIM HIS OWN PAGE! --PyukumukuAce (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- watch your caps, and look for significant coverage on it if you want. just be ready for the likely case of the funny snake not having significant coverage, or significant enough coverage cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Rayquaza is not the most famous pokemon of all time, that goes to pikachu, but I do agree that more pokemon should have their own pages. Arenghtqru888 (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Pokémon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:17, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Should Decamark (officially known as ??????????) be included on this list?
editShould Decamark (officially known as ??????????) be included on this list? People put MissingNo. on the Gen I list, so should Decamark, a pokemon that was "programmed into the game to prevent game crashes" be included in Gen III? Arenghtqru888 (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Arenghtqru888 Decamark does not have nearly the level of reliable sourcing needed to be included. MissingNo is only included because it has a seperate article and is culturally significant beyond the franchise. Decamark does not have any of these qualities unfortunately, so should not be included due to not being an official Pokemon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- thanks for letting me know the reason Arenghtqru888 (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)