Talk:Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

After you reviewed a few of my GAs a feel it's only right to return the favour :) IAWW (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

I made a few copyedits I didn't feel worth discussing, feel free to revert any issues. IAWW (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your review It is a wonderful world! I believe I have addressed all of your comments. -Riley1012 (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Riley1012, I think you did a great job of addressing my concerns, especially on the comments regarding neutrality. I think this article is now ready to pass. Congrats! IAWW (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

Lead

Could you add a brief summary of what the "all-around" is? Including what events they compete in, and what a "rotation" (referred to later in the article) is. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggest linking "Romania" to Romania at the 2000 Summer Olympics. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggest adding which nation Olaru and Xuan competed for, and linking the nations as above. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Background

Suggest linking Russian as above. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggest adding in the prose what nation Viktoria Karpenko was competing for. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Qualification results

Looks good ;)

Competition summary and vault height controversy

The countries could be linked as above.

This difference in height was enough to throw off a gymnast's timing and technique:

• WP:NPOV: "avoid stating opinion as fact". I suggest attributing to expert consensus, or a specific expert.
• There is an issue with tense here too. The word "was" is past tense, but "a gymnast's timing and technique" is a general idea. I suggest replacing "a" with "the". IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

It could cause gymnasts to miss the contact between their hands and the vaulting horse, which had the potential to cause serious injures: Another tense inconsistency. It would be good to attribute this to an expert or consensus. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

During the third rotation, Khorkina, who had not heard about the chance to re-do her vault, fell off the uneven bars: How is the option to re-do her vault related to her fall on the uneven bars? IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Ray, also rattled from her mistakes on the vault: Opinion, attribute IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

allowing her to jump up 21 places in the standings: "allowing her" is a bit indirect. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggest linking the first instances the individual events are mentioned. I think it is quite likely the reader will want to know more about them. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Romanian gymnast Andreea Răducan initially won the gold medal while her teammates, Simona Amânar and Maria Olaru won silver and bronze, respectively: Add a comma after the names to separate the non-restrictive appositive. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Andreea Răducan doping

Suggest linking "common cold" IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

she did not fail the doping test because she weighed more than Răducan: Opinion, attribute IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

The gold medal and silver medals: Do you mean "The gold and silver medals"? IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

was bumped up to the bronze medal: This doesn't quite make sense, because the bronze medal is not a position itself, but rather an award for finishing in third position. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggest linking "IOC president" IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Dong Fangxiao age falsification

at the time of the Olympic Games: I think be precise that it was the 2000 Olympics. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Final results

It looks really ugly having the references under the table like that, could they be added to a table caption to make it look better? IAWW (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Aftermath

The FIG also noted that the officials responsible were reprimanded but did not reveal the details: I think "stated" is more neutral than "noted" here. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Sources clock

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) Y

No current issues with link rot, but it would be nice if all links were archived to prevent issues in the future. Everything is formatted nicely. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Reliability (Criterion 2b) Y

All large newspapers, official reports, reliable athlete websites and subject specialist magazines/websites. I don't see any issues.

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) clock

Spot check based on this version.

[1a]: The source doesn't say she was the favourite, and even if it did it would be an opinion and would need attribution. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

[1b]: Y

[6a]: Y

[7a]: Y

[10b, 13]: Y

[17]: Y

[18c]: Y

[27]: Y

[31a, 32]: Y

[41]: Y

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) Y

Earwig detects nothing, and all the sources are online so it is very unlikely it missed anything.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) Y

It would be nice if there was some coverage of reputable media's reaction to the controversies, but I don't think this is needed for GA. IAWW (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Media Y

No good images on Commons unfortunately.

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.