Talk:El Apóstol/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Lazman321 (talk · contribs) 07:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Paleface Jack (talk · contribs) 15:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Emerging from dark corners of the void to review this article. More to follow.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for the wait, at the moment I am burdened by homework. I'll try to get this done tomorrow. Lazman321 (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Take your time. I will continue my review today. Paleface Jack (talk) 15:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

@Paleface Jack: What do you mean by "Some citations need to be reorganized to fit correctly." Lazman321 (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

@Lazman321 for example, if you have a piece of information and cite two sources it should read [1][2], some are out of order when you use multiple citations for a sentence or paragraph. You don't do it too often here but they are minor errors that can be easily fixed. Paleface Jack (talk) 01:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Paleface Jack: Okay, that's been addressed, along with the image size. Lazman321 (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Lazman321 I will complete the review later today. Paleface Jack (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written: Lead You don't necessarily need "using cutout animation" for the lead as the sentence before that is perfect as it is. Similarly, starting with "The film began production after..." can be simplified to "Production began after...", small simplifications tighten the structure and carried into the main body, though I will leave that up to you. Plot Pass Production The end portion of the section", likely red tones to represent flames and blue tones to represent floods" reads like conjecture. That probably should be removed as it is unnecessary. I have also noticed there are some names of people and whatnot that have articles on the spanish wikipiedia. I have linked some to save you the trouble but if you find any more while I wait for these changes, feel free to add them. Release and other sections will be checked after these changes.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Release and Legacy' link La Razón. Possibly add the current roundup for $1000 (adjusted for inflation). Full names for the people involved are unnecessary, considering they are used earlier in the article. Just used the last name.
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Some citations need to be reorganized to fit correctly.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.	Good.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Good. Good.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Good.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Information on Cristiani's other film projects should be condensed (this should only be brief in mention).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Good.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Good.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All are free images.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	The image of the cutout should be smaller as it takes up a lot of article space.
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.