Talk:Code Geass

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Piotrus in topic Good source

US manga sales

edit

http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/feature/bandai_downsizing_ken_iyadomi_interview says it was one of their top 4 manga sellers ever. A distinction. --Gwern (contribs) 22:49 3 January 2012 (GMT)

I was just looking.

edit

I wasn't sure if to ask first, or noticed if one was a repeated said part. In the articles' or "article's" body over at 'International licensing' there's a ref? On the same line. So, is that a right area it's at? Or rid out. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 23:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

It's wrong. There are lots of articles in poor states like this, but it lacks a skilled editor to bring it up to par. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oh? Because at the time, I saw the area. It went with 'that' and in the section, usually lists the bullet points. And it doesn't have a 'ref' number in front of the section heading. So, just rid it out/ delete it out. Since it mentions it in the last two sentences above it. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Code Geass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Code GEass" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect Code GEass has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § DUran Duran until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 09:32, 20 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good source

edit

If anyone is interested in expanding this further, there is some more detail in my entry on the show in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction at https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/code_geass . I am the author and copyright owner of the cited article, and I release it hereunder under CC-BY-SA (SFE is allowed to republish and reuse my work - but so is Wikipedia). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:23, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply