Talk:C 202 (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 25 June 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from C202 to C 202 (film). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 25 June 2025

Latest comment: 11 months ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Without having looked into it too deeply, the nom is stating that C.202 is used in the poster, but C 202 is used in sources, so based on that, the best choice appears to be C 202 (film), with hatnotes as needed. C.202 might be unique enough to meet WP:SMALLDIFFS unless somebody disagrees there, so I will hold off changing the redirect and hope that hatnotes might suffice (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 17:41, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

C202 → C.202 (film) – The poster and text of the article does not use "C202" and instead uses "C.202" -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. Tenshi! (Talk page) 11:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I am the nominator C 202 (film) is also good, as the title used in the sources is "C 202" -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Comment Note that C.202 is a primary redirect to Macchi C.202 Folgore, an unrelated topic. 162 etc. (talk) 22:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguate both C202 and C.202 somehow. No opinion on which title to give the film. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic