Talk:Bringelly

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bringelly, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070830075946/http://www.busabout.com.au/HTML/Route853-4-5/R853-4-5Map.html to http://www.busabout.com.au/HTML/Route853-4-5/R853-4-5Map.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bringelly, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080418182101/http://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/adetailedhistoryofliverpool.htm to http://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/adetailedhistoryofliverpool.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 8 April 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: All moved, except Castlecrag, New South Wales. There is some opposition to the Castlecrag case specifically, which suggests it might merit a separate discussion, but otherwise consensus to move, and this is consistent with WP:NCAUST as well as broader WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE policies  — Amakuru (talk) 20:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

---

Note to closer: There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Requested moves per WP:NCAUST and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC regarding the relevant naming conventions. Recommend a procedural close pending the outcome of that discussion.

• Bringelly, New South Wales → Bringelly
• Bundeena, New South Wales → Bundeena
• Bungarribee, New South Wales → Bungarribee
• Burraneer, New South Wales → Burraneer
• Burwood Heights, New South Wales → Burwood Heights
• Cabramatta, New South Wales → Cabramatta
• Camden South, New South Wales → Camden South
• Canley Heights, New South Wales → Canley Heights
• Canley Vale, New South Wales → Canley Vale
• Caringbah South, New South Wales → Caringbah South
• Carnes Hill, New South Wales → Carnes Hill
• Carss Park, New South Wales → Carss Park
• Castlecrag, New South Wales → Castlecrag
• Casula, New South Wales → Casula
• Catherine Field, New South Wales → Catherine Field
• Cattai, New South Wales → Cattai
• Cecil Hills, New South Wales → Cecil Hills
• Central Macdonald, New South Wales → Central Macdonald
• Clemton Park, New South Wales → Clemton Park
• Coasters Retreat, New South Wales → Coasters Retreat

– Unnecessary disambiguation and inline with other towns that don't need disambiguation (such as Mosman or Bankstown). Per WP:NCAUST. New pages already redirect to current page. GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:17, 8 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Note: WikiProject Cities, alian Wikipedians' notice board, WikiProject Sydney, and WikiProject Australian places have been notified of this discussion. GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Strong oppose and recommend withdrawal of Castlecrag from the list. I would recommend doing Castlecrag seperately as there is already a redirect note there. I will change my vote to support if Castlecrag is withdrawn and done separately Servite et contribuere (talk) 06:51, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose per Servite et contribuere. A pageview analysis doesn't show a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC when considering Castlecrag, New South Wales along with the various other Castle Crags. Tomiĉo (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Tomiĉo I am not opposed to making Castlecrag, New South Wales just Castlecrag but moving many pages at once has potential to be WP:Trainwreck. Castlecrag, New South Wales should be discussed separately Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Fair enough. Agree with the idea of dealing with Castlecrag, New South Wales separately. Tomiĉo (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

• Comment For the listed articles I see no potential conflicts other than Castlecrag as already identified. However per the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Requested moves per WP:NCAUST and WP::PRIMARYTOPIC. I think we should establish a clear consensus on whether these moves are actually necessary or if we are just creating a mess for ourselves with these RMs and moves. Dfadden (talk) 20:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

• Support per nom, adding the state doesn't help especially since they're PRIMARYTOPICs.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
• Support per nom. Minxlyn (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

GMH Melbourne Can we withdraw Castlecrag, New South Wales and do a RM on it's own please? Servite et contribuere (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.