Talk:Blair Babes
(Redirected from Talk:Blair Babe)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Tenshi Hinanawi in topic Requested move 4 July 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blair Babes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | A fact from Blair Babes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | On 4 July 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Blair Babe to Blair Babes. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 4 July 2025
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Blair Babe → Blair Babes – Per MOS:PLURAL, which states an exception to plural titles is "groups of distinct entities that are nevertheless often considered together". Usage of the term is overwhelmingly plural. It's not, for example, Tony's Crony. Zinderboff (talk) 08:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 08:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:59, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- You brought this up a year ago and received only one response, which you ignored. I don't think there seems to be a lot of interest in this article's name, so if I were you I'd go right ahead and change it. Saitzken (talk) 03:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Saitzken if I could've moved it unilaterally, I would've BOLDly done so. However, I am unable to do so. Thus I am requesting this move. Zinderboff (talk) 10:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Funny, I tried to move the page myself and it told me i couldn't because the name was invalid. Is this what you are referring to?
- Anyway, pinging @ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter, @PiaLily and @Maurnxiao as they are the only other users to have been active in this article or its corresponding talk page within the past year. Saitzken (talk) 11:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- And, surprise surprise, two of them have been banned. Saitzken (talk) 11:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Saitzken if I could've moved it unilaterally, I would've BOLDly done so. However, I am unable to do so. Thus I am requesting this move. Zinderboff (talk) 10:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Elections and Referendums, WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, and WikiProject Women's History have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 08:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Move to Blair babes. This is about a category of people, not the name of a specific organization. I see no justification to capitalise it. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose lowercasing. "Blair Babes" is the nickname for the group, i.e. a proper name. If you lowercase it, that'd mean the term is referring to the women as babes. The term wasn't invented because Blair was going around with a group of very attractive women. Support move to Blair Babes. TurboSuperA+(connect) 19:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- The term is referring to women as babes, regardless of whether it is capitalized or not. It is only capitalized for significance, which is not Wikipedia practice. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support per OP and archived arguments. Saitzken (talk) 03:43, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support per OP. More babes!!! — Czello (music) 17:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.