Talk:Berry Bros. & Rudd

Latest comment: 24 days ago by Oneberryone in topic Resubmitting COI request

Fair use rationale for Image:Bbr-logo.gif

edit

Image:Bbr-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Bbr-logo.gif

edit

Image:Bbr-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Bbr.png Nominated for Deletion

edit
An image used in this article, File:Bbr.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Berrybros.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
An image used in this article, File:Berrybros.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Berry headmast.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
An image used in this article, File:Berry headmast.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have just added {{Advert}} to this article. While it seems to me that the company is sufficiently notable to deserve a WP:EN article, this was entirely written by a staff member of the company User:3stjames -- note that the company's address is 3 St. James's Street, London. The user's only WP:EN contributions have been this article.

It needs a major rewrite to be appropriate here.

  • "- Pioneering a completely new concept in wine retail, our Bin End Shop in Basingstoke "
  • "From the Georgian ambiance of Number Three St James's Street to our ultra-modern shop in Hong Kong, all of Berrys' shops offer you quality, individuality and a passion for wine."

are two more egregious examples, but the whole thing needs changing. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to mecontribs) 11:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Berry Bros. & Rudd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Berry Bros. & Rudd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

COI edit request 11-MAR-2026

edit

Hello, I would like to request an update to the leadership information in the article to reflect reliably published details about the succession of the CEO role.

Thank you for considering this request. Oneberryone (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 23-MAY-2026

edit

  Unable to implement  

  • Your edit request could not be implemented because the provided references are not formatted correctly. The citation style predominantly used by the Berry Bros. & Rudd article is Citation Style 1 (CS1). The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare refs. Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1.[1] (See WP:CITEVAR.) In the extended section below titled Citation style, I have illustrated two examples: one showing how the edit request was submitted, and another showing how requests should be submitted in the future:
  • Kindly resubmit the edit request below at your earliest convenience, taking care to ensure that it makes use of CS1. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards,  Spintendo  08:49, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. "WP:CITEVAR - Wikipedia:Citing sources". Wikipedia. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2018. Guideline: It is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it.

Resubmitting COI request

edit

Hello, based on instruction from Spintendo, I am resubmitting edit requests initially submitted on 11th March 2026. I believe that the formatting issue has been addressed. Kindly note there has been a further leadership update since original request, so I have reflected that in new cited wording. Thank you for considering this request.

Proposed edits:

1. Leadership update

“In 2020, Emma Fox became CEO, succeeding Lizzy Rudd, who had been serving as interim executive chair following Dan Jago’s departure in January 2019. Lizzy Rudd continues in her role as Chair of the Board. In May 2026, it was announced that Emma Fox would step down as chief executive, with Rob Symington and Emily Rae appointed as co‑chief executives.”[1][2][3][4]

---

2. Historical clientele sentence replacement

Replace: “During the years, it has counted many famous customers among its clientele including: Lord Byron, William Pitt the Younger, the Aga Khan, and Beau Brummell.”

With: “Historical records kept at the St James’s Street shop list notable visitors such as Lord Byron, Beau Brummell, and William Pitt the Younger.”[5]

---

3. 63 Pall Mall redevelopment replacement

“The redevelopment of Berry Bros. & Rudd’s retail footprint began in 2017 with the opening of a purpose-built wine shop at 63 Pall Mall, designed to create a modern retail space adjacent to the firm’s historic premises on St James’s Street. The project involved transforming the ground floor and cellar areas of the adjoining building into a contemporary wine shop. The new shop was designed by Mowat & Company.”[6][7]

---

4. Offices update

Replace current office wording with:

“Berry Bros. & Rudd operates offices in London and Basingstoke, as well as international offices in Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, and Washington, D.C. The company opened its first U.S. retail store and office in Washington, D.C. in 2025.”[8][9][10]

Requested changes: Remove outdated reference to Battersea; update to reflect current locations.

---

5. Section removal request

Please remove the section titled “The Future of Wine report.”

Rationale: Per WP:UNDUE and WP:WEIGHT, the section gives disproportionate prominence to a single speculative report from 2008 that has not received sustained independent coverage or demonstrated lasting significance. It therefore does not merit inclusion in proportion to the company’s broader documented history. Oneberryone (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

  1. "Berry Bros chief executive Emma Fox to step down". The Drinks Business. May 2026. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  2. "Berry Bros & Rudd CEO steps down". Meininger's International. May 2026. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  3. "Berry Bros. & Rudd appoints new chief executive". The Drinks Business. 16 July 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  4. "Berry Bros & Rudd confirms Lizzy Rudd as CEO". The Drinks Business. 21 March 2019. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  5. "Berry Bros & Rudd". Whiskipedia. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  6. "47–1 Pall Mall project". CMA Planning. CMA Planning. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  7. "63 Pall Mall". Jackson Coles. Jackson Coles. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  8. "Berry Bros. & Rudd". LinkedIn. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  9. "The Washington store". Berry Bros. & Rudd. Berry Bros. & Rudd. Retrieved 26 May 2026.
  10. "Berry Bros & Rudd opens in Washington as US thirst for heritage grows". The Drinks Business. June 2025. Retrieved 26 May 2026.