This is the talk page for discussing Pinjarra massacre and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Pinjarra massacre is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Latest comment: 7 months ago5 comments5 people in discussion
This article had substantial deletions on the 20th March after someone had added extensive improvements last year to give it a neutral point of view. It is now no longer of a neutral point of view and many important pieces of information have been removed. They would be good starting points for someone looking for primary references.
Could somebody explain why much of this article has been deleted and why it now has a biased point of view?
Could we revert it and try and work towards a neutral article that presents the case from both the point of view of local settlers and local Aboriginals?
86.151.26.5222:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have heavily edited and reorganised this article to provide a more detailed and accurate coverage, including references. Hope it now meets with people's approval. Does it still rank as a stub? John D. Croft14:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Anyone that thinks for a single moment that this is a neutral article needs mental help. This is a decidedly anti-European page written by some white-hating left-wing fanatic (obviously the aborigines wrote nothing at all). A disgrace. 2A00:23C4:B607:CB01:D946:D8AA:F8AB:D8E9 (talk) 17:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The use of 'murdered' for the settlers and 'were killed' for indigenous people is a problem with neutrality. Leaving aside whether, under legal definitions of the day, the settlers were 'murdered', the use of active voice for the killing of white people and passive voice for the killing of black people shows a clear bias in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-31283-53 (talk • contribs) 5 November 2025
Interesting article which names two members of the Binjarep group. Nunan was identified but escaped. Munna was killed. The article also entertains the idea that warring factions could be useful against each other [1]
.svg){kind=logo}
