Talk:Azizul Haque (Naxalite activist)
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Draftifying
editI draftified this article because every reference but two is or seems nonexistent or is completely unrelated. (I recognize that in the case of the references without links, the titles might not be findable via Google on account of being translations.) This leaves me suspicious of the factuality of the article altogether, though not enough to have it deleted, as WP:N might be met and there may be some truth in it verifiable by some reliable source. As this article was just created, the 404s cannot be explained as having been removed by their respective sites since publication.
The revision I'm going by is Special:Permalink/1301739317.
1.
A GoodReads review of a 1829 novel by Sir Walter Scott
2.
Nonexistent ISBN number
3.
404 not found
4.
No Google hits for that title
5.
An article titled "BEL recruitment 2022: Apply for 150 Trainee Engineer, Project Engineer posts at bel-india.in"
6.
No Google hits for that title
7.
404 not found
8.
No Google hits for that title
9.
No Google hits for that title (though I do see a Sumanata Banerjee having authored other works about the Naxalites)
10.
Nothing obvious to search on
11.
Google turns up two hits for the phrase "red shadow over bengal" but one's a dynamic index of articles and the other is a junk page.
12.
No Google hits for that title
13.
Good link
14.
No Google hits for that title
15.
404 not found
16.
404 not found
17.
No Google hits for that title in that publication
18.
No Google hits for that title
19.
"This site can't be reached"
20.
Leads to "Reds back on Crouch’s brace", a report about a football match
21.
Good link
22.
404 not found
23.
"This site can't be reached"
24.
No Google hits for that title
25.
No Google hits for that title
26.
404 not found
Useful references
editSome potentially useful obituaries; Eisamay, IndianExpress, Hindu. Should be more useful than the AI slop currently used. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 17:48, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- The article needs to be completely rewritten. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 18:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- I cleaned up all the AI slop. What remains is verifiable and sourced, but notability might still be in question. -- LWG talk 22:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, the only sources left at this point are obituaries. Thanks for the clean-up. Largoplazo (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nice work, thanks. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 10:44, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I cleaned up all the AI slop. What remains is verifiable and sourced, but notability might still be in question. -- LWG talk 22:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
