Talk:2024 World Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 400 metres/GA1

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Editør (talk · contribs) 00:45, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply


Hi @Editør, review is below. I made minor prose changes myself, let me know if you have any issues with my edits. IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review. I've changed your edit of the Qualification section, because it was excluding running the time of the entry standard exactly. I have already looked at several of your points and will try to come back for rest in the next few days. – Editør (talk) 10:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Editør Thanks, please ping me when done. IAWW (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
@It is a wonderful world, I have looked at everything. Let me know if I've missed anything or you have any additional points. – Editør (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding to my points, I think the article looks really good now. Nice work. Passing. IAWW (talk) 14:31, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) Magenta clockclock

edit

Lead

edit

Looks good :)

Background

edit

Looks good :)

Qualification

edit

entry standards of 51.60 s indoor or 50.50 s outdoor: Could you clarify what the major difference is between indoor and outdoor? IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Indoor tracks are typically 200 metres long and sloped inwards in the curves. Outdoor tracks are typically 400 metres long and flat. I have added the track length to the text, hopefully this clarifies it enough. – Editør (talk) 11:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 1

edit

Looks good :)

Semi-finals

edit

What is a "yellow card"? IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've added a wikilink to Yellow card (sport)#Athletics. – Editør (talk) 10:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Final

edit

A lot of this section is unsourced. IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The archived source was not the correct version, I've corrected this and added a second source for the former records. I believe everything is now covered. – Editør (talk) 10:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

There must be some available sourcing on the reactions/reception of the race. IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've added commentary from three secondary sources and a quote by Bol. – Editør (talk) 11:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sources Magenta clockclock

edit

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) checkY

edit

No issues for GA

Reliability (Criterion 2b) checkY

edit

Almost all World Athletics with one Reuters source

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) Magenta clockclock

edit

[3]: checkY

[5b]: checkY

[6]: checkY

[4c]: Doesn't support the time "10:20" IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've corrected the time per source. – Editør (talk) 10:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

[8a]: Good aside from the time "20:50" again IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've replaced the source with the result summary with the result details for the prose, which does include the time. – Editør (talk) 10:36, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

[9b]: Just misses that it was a tied season best IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've added as source her WA profile which includes her result statistics for 2024. – Editør (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) checkY

edit

Earwig finds nothing and I found no issues on the spot check.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) Magenta clockclock

edit

This article needs much more secondary sourcing. Here are some available:

I have used the Reuters source again, added the Olympics.com source, and added an Athletics Weekly article as source too. – Editør (talk) 11:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I also added a quote in the semi-finals subsection. – Editør (talk) 12:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Stable (Criterion 5) checkY

edit

Media checkY

edit

This article is extremely well illustrated.

Tags (Criterion 6a) checkY

edit

Captions (Criterion 6b) checkY

edit

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

edit

Suggest archiving unarchived links to prevent link rot IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

There is some inconsistency in your application of MOS:NUM: "Twenty-four" and "eighteen" are spelled out in the lead and background sections, while "25" and "19" and more are not spelled out. IAWW (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I spelled out the two other numbers. – Editør (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.