Moschorhinus is an extinct genus of therocephalian synapsid in the family Akidnognathidae with only one species: M. kitchingi, which has been found in the Late Permian to Early Triassic of the South African Karoo Supergroup. It was a large carnivorous therapsid, reaching 1.1–1.5 metres (3.6–4.9 ft) in total body length with the largest skull comparable to that of a lion in size, and had a broad, blunt snout which bore long, straight canines. These adaptations suggested it hunted much like a felid.
| Moschorhinus | |
|---|---|
| Restoration of Moschorhinus kitchingi | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Synapsida |
| Clade: | Therapsida |
| Clade: | †Therocephalia |
| Family: | †Akidnognathidae |
| Genus: | †Moschorhinus Broom, 1920 |
| Species: | †M. kitchingi |
| Binomial name | |
| †Moschorhinus kitchingi Broom, 1920 | |
| Synonyms | |
| |
While most abundant in the Late Permian, it survived into the Early Triassic in small numbers after the Late Permian Extinction, though these Triassic survivors had stunted growth. Following the extinction event, Moschorhinus ecologically replaced the gorgonopsians as the largest predator in the assemblage prior to the arrival of archosauriforms. Following its extinction, the large synapsid carnivore niche was later filled by cynodonts.
Taxonomy
editThe genus name Moschorhinus is derived from the Ancient Greek words μόσχος (mos'-khos) moschos for calf or young animal, and rhin/rhino- for nose or snout, in reference to its short, broad snout. The species name, kitchingi, refers to Mr. James Kitching, who originally found (but did not describe) the specimen.[2]
Kitching discovered the holotype specimen, a skull (best preserved, the palate), in the Karoo Supergroup in South Africa, near the village of Nieu-Bethesda. It was first described by paleontologist Robert Broom in 1920.[2] It is now one of the best known and most recognizable therapsids of the supergroup.[3]
Broom had previously named another species of therocephalian in 1907 from KwaZulu-Natal, Scymnosaurus warreni, that he later moved to Moschorhinus in 1932 as M. warreni, maintaining it as a distinct species. M. warreni was later recognised as a probable synonym of M. kitchingi by Kitching in his unpublished PhD thesis, and a re-description of the holotype in 2023 by David Groenewald and Christian Kammerer confirmed this proposal. As the older name, M. warreni would have taxonomic priority over M. kitchingi for the species. However, Groenewald and Kammerer (2023) believed it would be premature to establish M. warreni as the correct name, pending a revision of akidnognathid therocephalian taxonomy and the possibility that even older names may have seniority.[1]
Moschorhinus remains have been found most prominently in the Upper Permian to Lower Triassic Beaufort Group.[3][4][5]
Classification
editMoschorhinus is a therocephalian, a member of the clade Eutheriodontia and the sister taxon to cynodonts and modern mammals.[6] Moschorhinus is classified into the family Akidnognathidae, along with other large, carnivorous therapsids with strong skulls and large upper canines.[7]
Description
edit
Size
editMoschorhinus was a large therocephalian, reaching 1.1–1.5 metres (3.6–4.9 ft) in total body length.[8][9] NMQR 3351, a specimen with a skull length of 240 mm (9.4 in), was estimated to have weighed 84.3 kilograms (186 lb).[9] Permian specimens were larger than Triassic specimens, with Permian skulls averaging 207 mm (8.1 in) in length, while that of Triassic skull averaged 179 mm (7.0 in).[3]
Skull
editThe skull is similar to that of the gorgonopsians, with large temporal fenestrae (three in total as a synapsid) and a convexly bowed palate. The snout of Moschorhinus is characteristically short and broad. The blunt tip of the snout features a ridge running down the midline to the frontal bone.[7][4] The lower jaw is much broader than that of any other therocephalian.[7][4] The upper snout projects a bit beyond the incisors in juveniles.[4] The nostrils were large and positioned towards the tip of the snout.[4]
The palate is convex, with a broad, triangular vomer, with paired tubercles, rounded projections pointing ventrally,[7][4] similar to other akidnognathids.[2] The palatine bones (forming the back of the roof of the mouth) are enlarged and thick, especially on their outer edges where they are joined to the maxilla. On their inner edges, the palatines are joined to the pterygoid and vomer on the nose, forming part of the circumference of the nasal cavity. Between the palatine and maxilla, just behind the canines, are large foramens, presumably to allow for nerves. A slanting ridge along the middle of the palatine presumably supported a soft palate, which allowed air to travel between the nose and the lungs.[7]
The closely related Promoschorhynchus shows stiff folds (choanal crest) on the border of the nasal passage and the throat, used to keep it open and to allow for breathing while eating. The development of a secondary palate in the skull gradually evolved in therocephalians, and the choanal crest is featured in all later therocephalians.[10]
Tracing the roof of the skull, Moschorhinus possesses small prefrontal bones above the eyes, followed by large, widened frontal bones. The parietals form a narrow sagittal crest along the midline of the skull, which houses a very basic pineal foramen.[2][4] Indentations can be seen in the temporal fossae, depressions on either side of the crest, indicating the presence of many blood vessels and nerves supplying the brain.[11]
The lacrimal bone is larger than the reduced prefrontal, and forms the majority of the eye socket. The lacrimal has a bony boss (a rounded knob) on the orbit, and a large foramen towards its inner side. The lower edge of the eye socket is formed the jugal and maxillary bones.[2] The jugal ends at the eye socket, and is not convex, as in several later therocephalians.[4]
Dentition
editMoschorhinus is thought to have had a dental formula of I6.C1.M3, with 6 incisors, 1 canine, and 3 postcanines in either side of the upper jaw.[2] The incisors are housed in the premaxillae. They are large, curve slightly, and have a bell-shaped cross-section. They had smooth cutting surfaces, and, unlike those of other therocephalians, lacked facets or striae resulting from abrasion and wear.[4] The large canines are held within the maxillae, and are quickly identifiable features of Moschorhinus. In length, these sabers are comparable to gorgonopsians, although they were more round in the cross-section. While there is no real modern analogue, the most similar living example would be the clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa).[7]
Like other therocephalians, Moschorhinus had a reduced number of postcanines which were housed in the maxillae. In most therocephalians, the “teeth,” or rather toothlike projection (denticulations) of the pterygoid bones, are greatly reduced or missing, and in Moschorhinus they are absent.[4][10]
Postcranial remains
editMoschorhinus had a presacral vertebral count of 27, which is consistent with other therocephalians, which suggests compared to other therapsid clades, therocephalians had a highly conversed number of presacral vertebrae. The axial skeleton of Moschorhinus has remarkable similarities to Scaloposaurus along with differentiation, along with morphological changes in the ribs and vertebral structures in the transitional region. The seventh cervical vertebrae is noted to have been a transition to the dorsal region with the projection of the neural spine becoming more dorsal, the neural arch having an absence of the lateral ridge on the lateral margin, and an increase in the anteroposterior width. The ribs of the seventh cervical is more anteroposteriorly broader than preceding cervical ribs and nearly equal to succeeding dorsal ribs in length.[9]
The scapula of Moschorhinus was similar to that of other therocephalians by having an elongated scapular blade, a convex lateral surface, and lacking an acromion process. Compared to other eutherocephalians, the scapula of Moschorhinus and other akidnognathids were generally more robust. The humerus was more similar to basal therocephalians in the degree of its robustness and expansion of the epiphyses, compared to the comparatively narrow epiphyses of eutherocephalians. However, compared to basal therocephalians, the humerus supported a large, well-developed deltopectoral crest and lacked a ectepicondylar foramen. The radius and ulna were noted to have been relatively similar to other therocephalians.[9]
Paleobiology
edit
Growth
editFossil evidence shows that Triassic Moschorhinus grew faster than Permian ones, resulting in reduced body size in the former, largely believed to be an effect of the harsher environmental variability after the Permian Extinction (Lilliput effect).[3][12][4]
Predatory behavior
editFollowing the extinction of basal therocephalians (lycosuchids and scylacosaurids), eutherocephalians were predominantly small-bodied and were likely insectivores. However, a eutherocephalians such as Moschorhinus were able to re-evolved large body sizes and macropredatory behavior.[13] Valkenburgh and Jenkins (2002) hypothesized the combination of long, robust canines and flattened incisors suggests Moschorhinus was a cat-like predator, being able to pierce skin and hold onto struggling prey with its long canines.[7]
Paleoecology
edit
Daptocephalus Assemblage Zone
editMoschorhinus first appeared in the Lystrosaurus maccaigi-Moschorhinus subzone of the Daptocephalus Assemblage Zone.[14] Ash-fall deposits suggests the subzone dates between 253.48 ± 0.15 to 252.24 ± 0.11.[15][14] Contemporary therapsids included dicynodonts such as Dicyodon lacerticeps, Diictodon feliceps, Dinanomodon gilli, Daptocephalus leoniceps, Pelanomodon moschops, and Lystrosaurus, therocephalians such as Lycideops longcips, Nanictidops kitchingi, Promoschorhynchus, and Polycynodon elegans, cynodonts such as Cynosaurus suppostus, Nanictosaurus kitchingi, and Vetusodon elikhulu, the biarmosuchian Ictidorhinus matinsi, and gorgonopsians such as Cyonosaurus longiceps, Arcognathus curvimola, and Inostrancevia africana.[16][14] Sauropsids were represented by the pareiasaur Pareiasaurus serridens, the owenettid Owenetta rubidgei, and Spondylolesyes rubidgei, with amphibians including rhinesuchid temnospondyls Rhinesuchus and Uranpcentrodon senekalensis.[14] Moschorhinus was able to coexist with the smaller gorgonopsians due to its robust cranial and postcranial traits, additionally its fast growth may have given it a competitive advantage over the similar sized gorgonopsians.[9]
The Lystrosaurus maccaigi-Moschorhinus subzone had notable changes in the fauna compared to the Dicynodon-Theriognathus subzone. Rubidgeines died out early within the assemblage zone, with only Rubidgea surviving to the boundary before going extinct during a turnover event that separated the two subzones. The turnover event also saw the extinction of dicynodonts such as Aulacephalodon baini. Following their extinction, they were replaced by the Laurasian Inostrancevia.[16] Additionally, the whaitsiid Theriognathus was absent from the upper proportion of the assemblage zone, being replaced by Moschorhinus.[17]
The end of the assemblage zone coincided with the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, which saw the extinction of gorgonopsians, pareisaurs, and most dicynodonts.[3][18][19][16] Moschorhinus would survive the extinction event and ecologically replace the gorgonopsians and were the largest predators in the fauna after their extinction.[16][7]
Lystrosaurus Assemblage Zone
editThe Lystrosaurus Assemblage Zone is marked by the appearance of Lystrosaurus declivis and Lystrosaurus murrayi. New sauropsids represented by the archosauriforms Proterosuchus fergusi, Prolacerta broomi, Heleosuchus griesbachi and Noteosuchus colletti, the lepidosauromorpha Paliguana white, parareptiles Saurodektes kitchingorum, Coletta seca, Procolophon trigoniceps, Sauropareion anoplus, and Phonodus dutoitorum. Appearance of Triassic therapsids were represented by dicynodont Lsytrosaurus and Myosaurus gracilis, therocephalians Olivierosuchus parringtoni, Regisaurus jacobi, Scaloposaurus constrictus, Tetracynodon darti, and Ericiolacerta parva, and cynodonts Platycraniellus elegans, Progalesaurus lootsbergensis, Galesaurus planiceps, Thrinaxodon liorhinus. Amphibians were represented by temnospondyls such as Rhytidosteus capensis, Broomistega putterilli, Micropholis stowi, Thabanchuia oomie, Lydekkerina huxleyi, Eolydekkerina magna, Kestrosaurus dreyeri, and an indeterminate Trematosauridae.[20] Compared to Permian Moschorhinus, Triassic Moschorhinus were smaller than the former, likely in response to the harsher conditions of the Early Triassic. Despite the decrease in size, Moschorhinus was still the largest therocephalian of the Triassic.[3][21][4]
Extinction
editMoschorhinus would extinct in the Early Triassic after the Permian Extinction as the result of the second wave of extinction,[22][23][24][25] along with 80–95% of animal species, due to a mass hypoxia event. This appears to have led to stunted growth,[3] intense seasons, reduced ecosystem diversity, and a loss of forests.[4] Following the extinction of Moschorhinus by the Triassic, the large carnivorous synapsid niche was filled by cynodonts such as Cynognathus.[7]
References
edit- 1 2 Groenewald, D. P.; Kammerer, C. F. (2023). "Re-identification and updated stratigraphic context of the holotypes of the late Permian tetrapods Dicynodon ingens and Scymnosaurus warreni from KwaZulu-Natal". Palaeontologia Africana. 56: 171–179. hdl:10539/37143.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Broom R (1920). "On Some New Therocephalian Reptiles from the Karroo Beds of South Africa". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 351–354.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Huttenlocker AK, Botha-Brink J (2013). "Body size and growth patterns in the therocephalian Moschorhinus kitchingi (Eutheriodontia) before and after the end-Permian extinction in South Africa". Paleobiology. 39 (2): 253–77. doi:10.1666/12020. S2CID 86490421.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Huttenlocker, Adam (2013). The Paleobiology of South African Therocephalian Therapsids (Amniota, Synapsida) and the Effects of the End-Permian Extinction on Size, Growth, and Bone Microstructure (Ph.D). University of Washington.
- ↑ Rubidge, B. S.; Sidor, C. A. (2001). "Evolutionary Patterns Among Permo-Triassic Therapsids". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32 (1): 449–480. Bibcode:2001AnRES..32..449R. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114113.
- ↑ Huttenlocker Adam (2009). "An Investigation into the Cladistic Relationships and Monophyly of Therocephalian Therapsids" (PDF). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 157 (4): 865–891. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00538.x. S2CID 84603632. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 Mar 2023.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 van Valkenburgh B, Jenkins I (2002). "Evolutionary Patterns in the History of Permo-Triassic and Cenozoic Synapsid Predators" (PDF). Paleontological Society Papers. 8: 267–88. doi:10.1017/S1089332600001121. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-17.
- ↑ Botha, J. & Smith, R.M.H. (2005). "Lystrosaurus species composition across the Permo–Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin of South Africa". Lethaia. 40 (2): 125–137. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2007.00011.x. Full version online at "Lystrosaurus species composition across the Permo–Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin of South Africa" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-10. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Stuart, B. P.; Huttenlocker, A. K.; Botha, J. (2024). "The postcranial anatomy of Moschorhinus kitchingi (Therapsida: Therocephalia) from the Karoo Basin of South Africa". PeerJ. 12 e17765. e17765. doi:10.7717/peerj.17765. PMC 11326434. PMID 39148680.
- 1 2 Maier W, van den Heever J, Durand F (1996). "New therapsid specimens and the origin of the secondary hard and soft palate of mammals". Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 34: 9–19. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0469.1996.tb00805.x.
- ↑ Durand J F (1991). "A revised descripction of the skull of moschorhinus (therapsida, therocephalia)". Annals of the South African Museum. 99: 381–413.
- ↑ Richard J Twitchett (2007). "The Lilliput effect in the aftermath of the end-Permian extinction event" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 252 (1–2): 132–144. Bibcode:2007PPP...252..132T. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.038.
- ↑ Kammerer, CF; Masyutin, V. (2018). "A new therocephalian (Gorynychus masyutinae gen. et sp. nov.) from the Permian Kotelnich locality, Kirov Region, Russia". PeerJ. 6 e4933. doi:10.7717/peerj.4933. PMC 5995100. PMID 29900076.
- 1 2 3 4 Viglietti, Pia A. (2020). "Biostratigraphy of the Daptocephalus Assemblage Zone (Beaufort Group, Karoo Supergroup), South Africa". South African Journal of Geology. 123 (2): 191–206. doi:10.25131/sajg.123.0014.
- ↑ Gastaldo, Robert A.; Kamo, Sandra L.; Neveling, Johann; et al. (2020). "The base of the Lystrosaurus Assemblage Zone, Karoo Basin, predates the end-Permian marine extinction". Nature Communications. 11. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15243-7.
- 1 2 3 4 Kammerer, Christian F.; Viglietti, Pia A.; Butler, Elize; Botha, Jennifer (2022). "Rapid turnover of top predators in African terrestrial faunas around the Permian-Triassic mass extinction". Current Biology. 33 (11): 2283–2290. Bibcode:2023JVPal..43E3622B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.007. PMID 37220743. S2CID 258835757.
- ↑ Adam K. Huttenlocker; Fernando Abdala (2015). "Revision of the first therocephalian, Theriognathus Owen (Therapsida: Whaitsiidae), and implications for cranial ontogeny and allometry in nonmammaliaform eutheriodonts". Journal of Paleontology. 89 (4): 645–664. doi:10.1017/jpa.2015.32. S2CID 87382966.
- ↑ Smith, Roger M. H. (1995). "Changing fluvial environments across the Permian-Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin, South Africa and possible causes of tetrapod extinctions". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 117 (1–2): 81–104. Bibcode:1995PPP...117...81S. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(94)00119-S. ISSN 0031-0182.
- ↑ Benoit, Julien; Kammerer, Christian F.; Dollman, Kathleen; Groenewald, David P.; Smith, Roger M. H. (2024). "Did gorgonopsians survive the end-Permian "Great Dying"? A re-appraisal of three gorgonopsian specimens (Therapsida, Theriodontia) reported from the Triassic Lystrosaurus declivis Assemblage Zone, Karoo Basin, South Africa". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 638 112044. Bibcode:2024PPP...63812044B. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2024.112044. S2CID 267080711.
- ↑ Botha, Jennifer; Smith, R. M. H. (2020). "Biostratigraphy of the Lystrosaurus declivis Assemblage Zone (Beaufort Group, Karoo Supergroup), South Africa". South African Journal of Geology. 123 (2): 207–216. doi:10.25131/sajg.123.0015.
- ↑ Christian A. Sidor; Roger M. H. Smith; Adam K. Huttenlocker; Brandon R. Peecook (2014). "New Middle Triassic Tetrapods from the Upper Fremouw Formation of Antarctica and Their Depositional Setting". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 34 (4): 793–801. Bibcode:2014JVPal..34..793S. doi:10.1080/02724634.2014.837472. S2CID 128981733.
- ↑ Peter D Ward; Jennifer Botha; Roger Buik; Michiel O. De Kock; Douglas H. Erwin; Geoffrey H Garrison; Joseph L Kirschvink; Roger Smith (2005). "Abrupt and Gradual Extinction Among Late Permian Land Vertebrates in the Karoo Basin, South Africa". Science. 307 (5710): 709–714. Bibcode:2005Sci...307..709W. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.503.2065. doi:10.1126/science.1107068. PMID 15661973. S2CID 46198018.
- ↑ Botha J, Smith RM (2006). "Rapid vertebrate recuperation in the Karoo Basin of South Africa following the End-Permian extinction" (PDF). Journal of African Earth Sciences. 45 (4–5): 502–14. Bibcode:2006JAfES..45..502B. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2006.04.006. [dead link]
- ↑ Damiani, R.; Modesto, S.; Yates, A.; Neveling, J. (2003). "Earliest evidence of cynodont burrowing". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 270 (1525): 1747–1751. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2427. JSTOR 3592240. PMC 1691433. PMID 12965004.
- ↑ Smith, Roger; Botha, Jennifer (2005). "The recovery of terrestrial vertebrate diversity in the South African Karoo Basin after the end-Permian extinction". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 4 (6–7): 623–636. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.005.