Human zoos, also known as ethnological expositions, was a colonial practice of publicly displaying people, usually in a so-called "natural" or "primitive" state.[1] They were most prominent during the 19th and 20th centuries.[1] These displays often emphasized the supposed inferiority of the exhibits' culture, and implied the superiority of "Western society", through tropes that depicted marginalized groups as "savage".[2][3] They then developed into independent displays emphasizing the exhibits' inferiority to western culture and providing further justification for their subjugation.[4] Such displays featured in multiple colonial exhibitions and at temporary exhibitions in animal zoos.[5]

Etymology
editThe term "human zoo" was not generally used by contemporaries of the shows, and was popularised by the French researcher Pascal Blanchard. The term has been criticised for denying the agency of the shows' non-European performers.[6]
According to Sandra Koutsoukos, the term "human zoos" was likely coined by French historians and anthropologists and first appeared in a 2002 publication. It is widely used in academia to critique the inhumanity and racism of events that displayed people from cultures deemed "exotic" or "savage".[7]
Early precedents
edit
Public displays of people predated the ethnological exhibitions that became common during the nineteenth century.[8]
One of the earliest recorded examples was the zoo of Moctezuma in central Mexico, which contained not only a large collection of animals but also people, including dwarfs, albinos and hunchbacks. During the Renaissance, the Medici family maintained large menageries in Italy. In the 16th century, Cardinal Hippolytus Medici reportedly kept people from many different backgrounds alongside exotic animals, including individuals described as "Savages", as well as Moors, Tartars, Indians, Turks and Africans.[9]
In 1691, Jeoly, a tattooed man from Miangas, was purchased by the English explorer William Dampier while he was in Mindanao and exhibited in London. Dampier also intended to exhibit Jeoly's mother, but she died at sea before reaching England. Jeoly was marketed as "Prince Giolo" and remained on display for three months before dying of smallpox.[10]
One of the first modern public human exhibitions was P. T. Barnum's exhibition of Joice Heth on 25 February 1835, followed by exhibitions of Chang and Eng Bunker, the conjoined twins later known as the Siamese twins. Such exhibitions were common in circuses and freak shows.[11][12] Saartjie Baartman, of the Nama people, was exhibited in Britain and France under the name "Hottentot Venus" until her death in 1815.
During the 1850s, Maximo and Bartola, two microcephalic siblings from El Salvador, were exhibited in Europe and the United States under the names "Aztec Children" and "Aztec Lilliputians". Human zoos became common during the 1870s, in the period of New Imperialism.[13][14]
Expansion of ethnological exhibitions
edit
During the 1870s, public displays of individual people increasingly gave way to larger ethnological exhibitions featuring communities and groups of people. As European colonial empires expanded, these exhibitions became increasingly common across Europe and North America. Organizers promoted them as educational or scientific displays, but they often portrayed Indigenous peoples and other colonized groups as representatives of supposedly "primitive" cultures.[14]
One of the leading promoters of this new style of exhibition was German animal trader Carl Hagenbeck. In 1874, at the suggestion of German painter and illustrator Heinrich Leutemann, he organized an exhibition of Sámi people that differed from earlier displays by recreating what organizers presented as their "natural environment". People were exhibited alongside animals, plants, and reconstructed buildings intended to resemble their homelands, creating the impression that visitors were encountering distant cultures firsthand.[15][16] Hagenbeck later organized exhibitions featuring Nubians in 1876 and Inuit in 1880.[17]
During the following decades, ethnological exhibitions became a regular feature of zoological gardens, colonial exhibitions, and world's fairs across Europe and North America. At the Jardin d'Acclimatation, a zoological garden in Paris, exhibitions featuring Nubian and Inuit people began in 1877 and attracted large audiences. Between 1877 and 1912, approximately thirty ethnological exhibitions were presented there.[18]
By the end of the 19th century, human zoos had become a common feature of world's fairs, colonial exhibitions, and zoological gardens throughout Europe and North America.[15]
Gender and objectification
edit
Human zoos often reduced people to racial, cultural, or physical "types" for observation and study. Women were frequently sexualized, while both women and men were photographed, classified, examined, or displayed in ways that emphasized perceived difference and exoticism.[19][20]
One of the best-known examples is Saartjie Baartman, often referred to as the "Hottentot Venus". During the early 19th century, Baartman was exhibited in Britain and France, where promoters emphasized her body and portrayed her as a racialized curiosity. Visitors were encouraged to inspect and touch her, particularly her buttocks, which were presented as evidence of supposed physical difference. After her death in 1815, her remains were dissected and displayed at the Musée de l'Homme in Paris without her consent.[20]
Historian Dominika Czarnecka argues that the popularity of ethnographic exhibitions often depended on the sexualization of non-European women. Writing about exhibitions in late 19th-century Poland, she notes that women were often dressed in revealing costumes that reflected European expectations and fantasies rather than the clothing of the cultures they were claimed to represent. Although some were depicted as Amazon warriors, contemporary accounts frequently focused on their appearance and clothing.[21]
At the World's Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1893 and the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo in 1901, the belly dancer Little Egypt was photographed as a catalogued "type" by Charles Dudley Arnold and Harlow Higinbotham.[22]
By the 1930s, a new form of human exhibition appeared in the United States as nude shows presented as educational exhibits. At the Zoro Garden Nudist Colony at the Pacific International Exposition in San Diego, California (1935–1936), hired performers portrayed members of a nudist colony rather than actual nudists. At the Sally Rand Nude Ranch at the Golden Gate International Exposition in San Francisco (1939), women appeared wearing cowboy hats, gunbelts, and boots, with little other clothing. The exposition also featured a "Greenwich Village" show, described in the official guidebook as a "Model artists' colony and revue theatre".[23]
People could also be exhibited after death. Angelo Soliman, a man of Central African origin who became a prominent figure in Viennese society, was displayed after his death. His preserved body was exhibited in Vienna as an ethnographic specimen.[24]
Scientific racism
edit
Human zoos were closely associated with scientific racism during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Exhibitions were often presented as educational or scientific displays and were used to classify human populations according to perceived levels of cultural and biological development.[4]
Many exhibitions portrayed non-European peoples as living examples of an earlier stage of human development. Organizers recreated villages and daily activities that were presented as "natural" or "primitive", while displays emphasized stereotypes of cultural inferiority and the supposed superiority of Western societies.[5][2] Such displays supported imperialist narratives and were used to justify the subjugation of colonized peoples.[27]
In Germany, ethnological exhibitions and museums were promoted as educational institutions. Human displays were incorporated into zoological and anthropological exhibits, where visitors were encouraged to compare different cultures and societies. By the late 19th century, some exhibitions presented human groups as occupying different positions on an evolutionary scale, with Western Europeans portrayed as the most advanced.[28][4]
Human zoos at international expositions and world's fairs were often used to demonstrate contemporary ideas about race, civilization, and human progress. At the Louisiana Purchase Exposition of 1904, organizers exhibited Indigenous peoples from around the world in displays intended to illustrate contemporary theories of race, civilization, and human progress.[25] Associated events such as "Anthropology Days" compared participants through athletic competitions that organizers linked to contemporary ideas about race, civilization, and human progress.[29][30]
Human zoos at world's fairs and international exhibitions
editDuring the late 19th and early 20th centuries, world's fairs, colonial exhibitions, and other international events helped popularize human zoos in Europe and North America. Many were organized by imperial powers and featured people brought from their colonies. Participants were often housed in reconstructed villages and displayed performing daily activities for visitors.[5][14]
By the late 19th century, human displays had become a common feature of major international exhibitions. At the 1889 Paris World's Fair, approximately 400 Indigenous people were displayed in a "Negro Village", one of the exposition's most popular attractions. Visited by 28 million people, the fair exposed large audiences to staged representations of Indigenous and colonized peoples.[31][2] Similar exhibits appeared at international exhibitions in Amsterdam, Chicago, Brussels, and Buffalo.[14][31]
At the Louisiana Purchase Exposition of 1904 in St. Louis, more than 1,100 Filipinos were exhibited, while thousands of Indigenous people from around the world participated in anthropological exhibits and cultural demonstrations.[29][25] Associated events such as Anthropology Days reflected contemporary ideas about race, civilization, and human progress.[29][30]
Human displays continued to appear at major exhibitions throughout the first half of the 20th century, including the British Empire Exhibition of 1924, the Paris Colonial Exposition of 1931, the Portuguese World Exhibition of 1940, and Expo 58 in Brussels.[2][32]
Exhibition practices
edit
Although exhibition practices varied between countries, organizers, and venues, many human zoos of the late 19th and early 20th centuries shared common methods of staging, presentation, and interpretation.[14][5] People exhibited in human zoos were commonly presented as living representatives of cultures portrayed as "primitive", "exotic", or fundamentally different from those of the societies hosting the exhibitions.[14][5]
Reconstructed villages were among the most common features of human zoos. People on display were often housed in settings intended to represent their homelands, with traditional-style dwellings, plants, animals, and household objects arranged to create the impression of an authentic environment. During the 1870s, German animal trader Carl Hagenbeck popularized this approach by exhibiting people alongside animals and scenery intended to recreate their "natural environment". Similar reconstructed villages later appeared at the 1904 Bradford Exhibition, where Somali families lived in a purpose-built village, and at the 1887 Philippine Exposition in Madrid, where buildings and landscapes were designed to evoke the Philippines.[5][33][34]
Many people on display performed activities presented as representative of their cultures, including cooking, craftwork, music, dance, hunting, and other aspects of daily life. These performances reinforced contemporary ideas about cultural difference. At the Scottish National Exhibition of 1908 in Edinburgh, for example, residents of the Senegal Village demonstrated crafts and aspects of everyday life while living in beehive huts. Similar demonstrations also formed part of other ethnographic exhibitions.[5][35]
Official guidebooks, exhibition catalogues, and labels frequently identified people on display by ethnicity, nationality, or colonial origin, shaping how visitors understood the exhibits. At the British Empire Exhibition of 1924, for example, the official guide listed participants by colonial origin and approximate numbers as part of its description of the exhibition.[2]
The experiences of people exhibited in human zoos varied considerably. Some travelled under contracts as paid performers, while others had little control over how they were presented or the conditions under which they lived. During Expo 58 in Brussels, members of the Congolese village protested the condescending treatment they received from spectators and demanded to return home, bringing the exhibit to an early end.[36] In Germany, some performers who remained after ethnological exhibitions ended were unable to return home and later faced discrimination under the Nazi regime.[37]
Regional exhibitions
editAustralia
editIn 2007, Adelaide Zoo ran a Human Zoo exhibition which consisted of a group of people who, as part of a study exercise, had applied to be housed in the former ape enclosure by day, but then returned home by night.[38] The inhabitants took part in several exercises, and spectators were asked for donations towards a new ape enclosure.
Belgium
edit
The Brussels International Exposition (1897) in Tervuren featured a "Congolese Village" that displayed African people in ersatz interpretations of native settings.
A Congolese village was displayed at the Brussels 1958 World's Fair.[39] The Congolese on display were among 598 people—including 273 men, 128 women and 197 children, a total of 183 families.[40] Eight-month-old baby Juste Bonaventure Langa died during Expo 58; he rests in the Tervuren cemetery.[41] In mid-July, the Congolese protested the condescending treatment they were receiving from spectators and demanded to be sent home, abruptly ending the exhibit and eliciting some sympathy from European newspapers.[36]
Canada
editFrom 1936 to 1943, the Canadian province of Ontario displayed five White French Canadian quintuplets, whom the provincial government had removed from their birth family, in a human zoo called Quintland.[42]
France
editIn 1931, around 100 Kanak people from New Caledonia were displayed at the Jardin d'Acclimatation in Paris.[43] More than six decades later, in April 1994, people from an Ivory Coast village were presented as part of an African safari attraction later called Planète Sauvage[44] in Port-Saint-Père, near Nantes.[44]
Germany
editAs ethnogenic expositions were discontinued in Germany around 1931,[16] there were many repercussions for the performers. Many of the people brought from their homelands to work in the exhibits had created families in Germany, and there were many children that had been born in Germany. Once they no longer worked in the zoos or for performance acts, these people were stuck living in Germany where they had no rights and were harshly discriminated against. During the rise of the Nazi party, the foreign actors in these stage shows were typically able to stay out of concentration camps because there were so few of them that the Nazis did not see them as a real threat.[37] Although they were able to avoid concentration camps, they were not able to participate in German life as citizens of ethnically German origin could. The Hitler Youth did not allow children of foreign parents to participate, and adults were rejected as German soldiers.[37] Many ended up working in war industry factories or foreign laborer camps.[37]
Hans Massaquoi in his 1999 book Destined to Witness observed a human zoo within the Hamburg zoo Tierpark Hagenbeck during the pre-Nazi Germany period, in which an African family was placed with the animals, openly laughed at, and otherwise treated rudely by the public crowd. And then they turned upon him, a fellow spectator, due to his mixed appearance. The date, according to his book, was approximately 1930.[45]
In July 2005, the Augsburg Zoo in Germany hosted an "African village" featuring African crafts and African cultural performances. The event was subject to widespread criticism.[46] Defenders of the event argued that it was not racist since it did not involve exhibiting Africans in a debasing way, as had been done at zoos in the past. Critics argued that presenting African culture in the context of a zoo contributed to exoticizing and stereotyping Africans, thus laying the ground work for racial discrimination, and that solidarity and mutual understanding with African people were not primary aims of the event.[47]
Japan
edit
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Japan, like Western colonial powers, held a "human zoo" (人間動物園, ningen dōbutsuen) exhibiting people from various ethnic groups, including Ryukyuans, Ainu, Chinese, Taiwanese, and Koreans, to show off the inferiority of other Asian peoples and the superiority of the Japanese.[48][49][50]
Portugal
editAs part of the Portuguese World Exhibition in 1940, members of a tribe from the Bissagos Islands of Guinea-Bissau were displayed on an island in a lake in the Lisbon Tropical Botanical Garden.[32]
Spain
edit
Between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, several exhibitions of non-Western people were held in Spain, following those held in other areas like the United Kingdom.[34] The first of them was held in 1887 by the Ministry of Overseas, which exhibited a group of between 40 and 50 Filipino people (then a Spanish territory) together with local products and plants in the Retiro Park in Madrid.[34] For this exhibition, the Palacio de Cristal del Retiro was built, as well as its pond, which sought to recreate the "natural habitat" of the exposed people.[34][51] At least four people died during the exhibition.[51] In the following years, private companies organized similar exhibitions in Barcelona and Madrid, including of people who were not from Spanish territories, like the Ashanti or the Inuit. Until 1918, exhibitions of African people were held in the Ronda de la Universitat in Barcelona, which were later taken to other European countries.[34] There are also records of another exhibition in the Ibero-American Exposition of Seville in 1929 and an additional one of Fang people from Equatorial Guinea in Valencia in 1942.[52] Until 1997, the "Negro of Banyoles", an embalmed African man, was exhibited in the Darder Museum in Girona.[53]
In 1886, the Spanish displayed natives of the Philippines in an exhibition, as people whom they "civilized". This event added flame to the 1896 Philippine revolution.[54] Queen Consort of Spain, Maria Cristina of Austria, afterwards institutionalized the business of human zoos. By 1887, indigenous Igorot people & animals were sent to Madrid and were exhibited in a human zoo at the newly constructed Palacio de Cristal del Retiro.[55]
United states
edit
In 1896, to increase the number of visitors, the Cincinnati Zoo invited one hundred Sioux Native Americans to establish a village at the site. The Sioux lived at the zoo for three months.[57]
One of the best-known examples was the exhibition of Congolese man Ota Benga at the Bronx Zoo in New York City in September 1906. Under the direction of New York Zoological Society president Madison Grant and zoo director William Temple Hornaday, Benga was displayed alongside chimpanzees, an orangutan named Dohong, and a parrot. He was labeled the "Missing Link", reflecting racist theories of the time that falsely claimed Africans were closer to apes than Europeans in human evolution.[58] [56]
The exhibit quickly drew protests from Black clergy and community leaders, who condemned it as racist and degrading, even as the public reportedly flocked to see it. Following the public outcry, Hornaday closed the exhibit on 8 September 1906 after two days. Benga subsequently walked freely around the zoo grounds, where he was often followed by a crowd reportedly "howling, jeering and yelling".[59]
St. Louis World's Fair
editIn 1904, over 1,100 Filipinos were displayed at the St. Louis World's Fair in association with the 1904 Summer Olympics. Following the Spanish-American War, the United States had just acquired new territories such as Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico.[25] The organizers of the World's Fair held "Anthropology Days" on August 12 and 13. Since the 1889 Paris Exposition, human zoos, as a key feature of world's fairs, functioned as demonstrations of anthropological notions of race, progress, and civilization. These goals were followed also at the 1904 World's Fair. Fourteen hundred indigenous people from Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, East Asia, Africa, the Middle East, South America and North America were displayed in anthropological exhibits that showed them in their natural habitats. Another 1600 indigenous people displayed their culture in other areas of the Louisiana Purchase Exposition (LPE), including on the fairgrounds and at the Model School, where American Indian boarding school students demonstrated their successful assimilation.[60] The sporting event itself took place with the participation of about 100 paid indigenous men (no women participated in Anthropology Days, though some, notably the Fort Shaw Indian School girls basketball team, did compete in other athletic events at the LPE). Contests included "baseball throwing, shot put, running, broad jumping, weight lifting, pole climbing, and tugs-of-war before a crowd of approximately ten thousand".[29] According to theorist Susan Brownell, world's fairs – with their inclusion of human zoos – and the Olympics were a logical fit at this time, as they "were both linked to an underlying cultural logic that gave them a natural affinity".[61] Also, one of the original intentions of Anthropology Days was to create publicity for the official Olympic events.[62][29]
While Anthropology Days were not officially part of the Olympics program, they were closely associated with each other at the time, and in history—Brownell notes that even today historians still debate as to which of the LPE events were the "real" Olympic Games.[63] Additionally, almost all of the 400 athletic events were referred to as "Olympian,"[63] and the opening ceremony was held in May[64] with dignitaries in attendance, though the official Olympic program did not begin until July 1.[64] Also, as previously noted, one of the original intentions of Anthropology Days was to create publicity for the official Olympic events.[65][29]
The exhibitions of the World's Fair inspired US military officer Truman Hunt to start his own human zoo of "Head-Hunting Igorrotes" in Brooklyn. Reports of questionable living conditions for its Filipino performers led the US Federal government to investigate Hunt's exhibition, and eventually shut it down after Hunt was found guilty of wage theft from the performers.[66]
United Kingdom
editIn 1909, the infrastructure of the 1908 Scottish National Exhibition in Edinburgh was used to construct the new Marine Gardens to the coast near Edinburgh at Portobello.[67]
In 1925, a display at Belle Vue Zoo in Manchester, England, was entitled "Cannibals" and featured black Africans in supposedly native dress.[68]
In August 2005, London Zoo displayed four human volunteers wearing fig leaves (and bathing suits) for four days.[69]
In August 2014, as part of the Edinburgh International Festival, South African theatre-maker Brett Bailey's show Exhibit B was performed in the Playfair Library Hall, University of Edinburgh; then in September at The Barbican in London. This explored the nature of Human Zoos and raised much controversy both amongst the performers and the audiences.[70]
Backlash
edit
According to The New York Times, although "few expressed audible objection to the sight of a human being in a cage with monkeys as companions", controversy erupted as black clergymen in the city took great offense. "Our race, we think, is depressed enough, without exhibiting one of us with the apes", said the Reverend James H. Gordon, superintendent of the Howard Colored Orphan Asylum in Brooklyn. "We think we are worthy of being considered human beings, with souls."[71]
New York City Mayor George B. McClellan Jr. refused to meet with the clergymen, drawing the praise of Hornaday, who wrote to him: "When the history of the Zoological Park is written, this incident will form its most amusing passage."[71]
As the controversy continued, Hornaday remained unapologetic, insisting that his only intention was to put on an ethnological exhibition. In another letter, he said that he and Grant—who ten years later would publish the racist tract The Passing of the Great Race—considered it "imperative that the society should not even seem to be dictated to" by the black clergymen.[71]
1903 saw one of the first widespread protests against human zoos, at the "Human Pavilion" of an exposition in Osaka, Japan. The exhibition of Koreans and Okinawans in "primitive" housing incurred protests from the governments of Korea and Okinawa, and a Formosan woman wearing Chinese dress angered a group of Chinese students studying abroad in Tokyo. An Ainu schoolteacher was made to exhibit himself in the zoo to raise money for his schoolhouse, as the Japanese government refused to pay. The fact that the schoolteacher made eloquent speeches and fundraised for his school while wearing traditional dress confused the spectators. An anonymous front-page column in a Japanese magazine condemned these examples and the "Human Pavilion" in total, calling it inhumane to exhibit people as spectacles.[72]
With a view to tackling the morality of Human Zoo exhibits, 2018 saw the poster exhibition, Putting People on Display, tour Glasgow School of Art, the University of Edinburgh, the University of Stirling, the University of St Andrews and the University of Aberdeen. Additional posters were added to a selection from the French ACHAC's exhibition, Human Zoos: the Invention of the Savage, in relation to the Scottish dimension in hosting such shows.[73]
See also
editReferences
edit- 1 2 "The True Story of the Mindanaoan Slave Whose Skin Was Displayed at Oxford". Esquiremag.ph. Archived from the original on 4 November 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Abbattista, Guido; Iannuzzi, Giulia (2016). "World Expositions as Time Machines: Two Views of the Visual Construction of Time between Anthropology and Futurama". World History Connected. 13 (3). Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
- ↑ McLean, Ian (2009–2012). "Reinventing the Savage". Third Text. 26 (5): 599–613. doi:10.1080/09528822.2012.712769. ISSN 0952-8822. S2CID 143936550. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
- 1 2 3 Lewis, R. Barry; Jurmain, Robert; Kilgore, Lynn (2010). Understanding humans: introduction to physical anthropology and archaeology (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0495604174. OCLC 276822759.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Colonial Exhibitions, 'Völkerschauen' and the Display of the 'Other'". EGO (in German). Archived from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ↑ Hilke Thode-Arora (22 December 2021). Demski, Dagnosław; Czarnecka, Dominika (eds.). Staged Otherness: Ethnic Shows in Central and Eastern Europe, 1850–1939. Central European University Press. pp. 45–75. ISBN 9789633866887.
- ↑ "The untold stories behind human zoos and freakshows". Unicamp. 29 January 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
- ↑ Mullan, Bob, and Garry Marvin. Zoo Culture: The Book About Watching People Watch Animals. 2nd ed. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1998, p. 32.
- ↑ Mullan, Bob, and Garry Marvin. Zoo Culture: The Book About Watching People Watch Animals. 2nd ed. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1998, pp. 32, 98.
- ↑ Mangubat, L. "The True Story of the Mindanaoan Slave Whose Skin Was Displayed at Oxford." Esquire, 2017.
- ↑ "The Museum of Hoaxes". Archived from the original on 29 May 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2016.
- ↑ Jonassohn, Kurt. "On A Neglected Aspect Of Western Racism." Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, December 2000.
- ↑ Roberto Aguirre. Informal Empire: Mexico and Central America in Victorian Culture. University of Minnesota Press, 2004, chapter 4.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Abbattista, Guido (2014). "Human Zoos". European History Online. Leibniz Institute of European History. Archived from the original on 22 March 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
- 1 2 Abbattista, Guido (2014). "Human Zoos". European History Online. Leibniz Institute of European History. Archived from the original on 22 March 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
- 1 2 Zeitler, Annika (3 October 2017). "Human zoos: When people were the exhibits". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
- ↑ The International Journal of African Historical Studies. Africana Publishing Company. 1985. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ↑ Blanchard, Pascal; Bancel, Nicolas; Boëtsch, Gilles (2008). Human Zoos: Science and Spectacle in the Age of Colonial Empires. Liverpool University Press.
- ↑ Czarnecka, Dominika (2020). "Black Female Bodies and the "White" View". East Central Europe. 47 (2–3): 285–312. doi:10.30965/18763308-04702006.
- 1 2 Lederman, Muriel; Bartsch, Ingrid (2001). The Gender and Science Reader. Routledge. ISBN 0415213576.
- ↑ Czarnecka, Dominika (2020). "Black Female Bodies and the "White" View". East Central Europe. 47 (2–3): 285–312. doi:10.30965/18763308-04702006.
- ↑ Anne Maxwell, "Montrer l'Autre: Franz Boas et les soeurs Gerhard", in Zoos humains. De la Vénus hottentote aux reality shows, Nicolas Bancel, Pascal Blanchard, Gilles Boëtsch, Eric Deroo, Sandrine Lemaire, eds., La Découverte, 2002, pp. 331–339, especially p. 333.
- ↑ "Sally Rand – The Music Box and Sally Rand Nude Ranch at Treasure Island – 1939". sfmuseum.org. Archived from the original on 28 February 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
- ↑ Kontler, László (2020). "Relocating the "Human Zoo": Exotic Displays, Metropolitan Identity, and Ethnographic Knowledge in Late Nineteenth-Century Budapest". East Central Europe. 47 (2–3): 173–201. doi:10.30965/18763308-04702002.
- 1 2 3 4 Zwick, Jim (4 March 1996). "Remembering St. Louis, 1904: A World on Display and Bontoc Eulogy". Syracuse University. Archived from the original on 10 June 2007. Retrieved 25 May 2007.
- ↑ Love, Robertus (May 1904). "Filipino School at World's Fair". The School News and Practical Educator. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2020.
- ↑ Conklin, Alice L.; Fletcher, Ian Christopher (1999). European imperialism, 1830–1930: climax and contradiction. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. ISBN 0395903858.
- ↑ Penny, H. Glenn (2002). Objects of culture: ethnology and ethnographic museums in Imperial Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0807862193. OCLC 55602080.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Parezo, Nancy J., ed. Anthropology Goes to the Fair: The 1904 Louisiana Purchase Exposition. University of Nebraska Press, 2008.
- 1 2 Brownell, Susan, ed. The 1904 Anthropology Days and Olympic Games: Sport, Race, and American Imperialism. University of Nebraska Press, 2008.
- 1 2 "The Human Zoo: Science's Dirty Secret" (PDF). usd116.org. Channel Four Television Corporation. 2009. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
- 1 2 Martins, Rui (21 June 2020). "Qual é a história do Jardim Botânico Tropical de Belém?". Casa das Aranhas. Archived from the original on 12 July 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
- 1 2 Iqbal, Aisha (8 June 2025). "Reclaiming the story of Bradford's 1904 Somali village". BBC News.
- 1 2 3 4 5 "Macabro testimonio en fotos de los "zoos humanos" de Madrid llega a Paraguay". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). 3 May 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- ↑ Edinburgh City Libraries (25 August 2015). "Saughton's glorious summer of 1908". Tales of One City. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
- 1 2 Stanard, Matthew (April 2005). "'Bilan du monde pour un monde plus déshumanisé': The 1958 Brussels World's Fair and Belgian Perceptions of the Congo". European History Quarterly. 35 (2): 267–298. doi:10.1177/0265691405051467. ISSN 0265-6914. S2CID 143002285.
- 1 2 3 4 "'You Better Go Back to Africa'| Interview." "You Better Go Back to Africa"| Interview, DW English, 18 June 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=baGXUsOKBcU.
- ↑ "Humans on display at Adelaide Zoo". tvnz. 12 January 2007. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014.
- ↑ (in French) Cobelco. Belgium human zoo; "Peut-on exposer des Pygmées? [link broken]". Le Soir. 27 July 2002. Archived from the original on 8 February 2005.
- ↑ (in English) "Belgium comes to terms with 'human zoos' of its colonial past". The Guardian. 16 April 2018. Archived from the original on 17 April 2023. Retrieved 31 August 2023.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link); "Belgium comes to terms with 'human zoos' of its colonial past". The Guardian. 16 April 2018. Archived from the original on 17 April 2023. - ↑ (in English) The human zoo of Tervuren (1897); "The human zoo of Tervuren (1897)". Royal Museum for Central Africa. 15 September 2020. Archived from the original on 9 May 2023.
- ↑ Emery, Tom (28 May 2022). "Quintuplets' story remains one of shame, regret; sisters lives on display for the fortune of others". Journal-Courier. Retrieved 6 September 2024.
- ↑ "'Human Zoos' go on show in Paris – The Local France, 29/11/2011". The Local France. 29 November 2011. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
- 1 2 Barlet, Olivier and Blanchard, Pascal, "Le retour des zoos humains" Archived 22 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine, abridged in "Les zoos humains sont-ils de retour?", Le Monde, 28 June 2005. (French)
- ↑ Destined to Witness, pgs. 24-25
- ↑ (in English and French) "Vers un nouveau zoo humain en Allemagne? (original text in English below the French translation)". Indymedia. 6 December 2005. Archived from the original on 19 March 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2006.; "England Hacks Away at the Shaken EU". Der Spiegel. 6 June 2005.; "A Different View of the Human Zoo". Der Spiegel. 13 June 2005.; "Zoo sparks row over 'tribesmen' props for animals, by Allan Hall". The Scotsman. 8 June 2005. Archived from the original on 9 December 2006. Retrieved 21 January 2006.; Critical analysis of the Augsburg human zoo Archived 4 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine ("Organizers and visitors were not racist but they participated in and reflected a process that has been called racialization: the daily and often taken-for-granted means by which humans are separated into supposedly biologically based and unequal categories", etc.)
- ↑ Schiller, Nina Glick; Dea, Data; Höhne, Markus (4 July 2005). "African Culture and the Zoo in the 21st Century: The "African Village" in the Augsburg Zoo and Its Wider Implications" (PDF). Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 January 2006.
- ↑ Hall, Jeffrey J. (6 April 2021). Japan's Nationalist Right in the Internet Age: Online Media and Grassroots Conservative Activism. Taylor & Francis. p. 103.
- ↑ "In the Days of Human Zoos". CNRS News. 22 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2025.
- ↑ "Japan broadcaster NHK cleared of defamation for using 'human zoo' to describe Taiwan aborigines". The Straits Times. 21 January 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2025.
- 1 2 "El parque del Retiro de Madrid acogió un zoológico humano en 1887". Público (in Spanish). 25 September 2018. Archived from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- ↑ Bono, Ferran (19 February 2020). "Cuando España se sumó a la moda de exhibir africanos en 'zoos humanos'". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- ↑ "El Negro de Banyoles fue enterrado en un país equivocado". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). 1 March 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
- ↑ Arcilla, Jose S. (1991). "The Enlightenment and the Philippine Revolution". Philippine Studies. 39 (3): 358–373. JSTOR 42633263.
- ↑ Limos, M. A. (2020). The Story Behind Spain's Infamous Zoo That Featured Philippine Animals... And Then Filipinos. Esquire Publications.
- 1 2 "Man and Monkey Show Disapproved by Clergy". The New York Times. 10 September 1906. Archived from the original on 8 May 2016.
- ↑ Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Archived 7 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Ohio Historical Society.
- ↑ Bradford, Phillips Verner and Blume, Harvey. Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the Zoo. St. Martin's Press, 1992.
- ↑ Keller, Mitch (6 August 2006). "The Scandal at the Zoo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2008.
- ↑ Karen Abbott (7 August 2012). "The 1904 Olympic Marathon May Have Been the Strangest Ever". Smithsonian Magazine.
- ↑ Brownell, Susan, ed. (2008). p. 29.
- ↑ Brownell, Susan, ed. (2008). p. 34.
- 1 2 Brownell 2008, p. 3.
- 1 2 Brownell 2008, p. 43.
- ↑ Brownell 2008, p. 34.
- ↑ Hemley, Robin (14 November 2014). "Claire Prentice's 'Lost Tribe of Coney Island'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
- ↑ Freeman, Sarah (12 June 2015). "Portobello, 99 ice creams, and Britains's last seaside heritage: the sweet taste of success". The Independent. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
- ↑ Paul A. Rees, An Introduction to Zoo Biology and Management, Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (West Sussex), 2011, p. 44. ISBN 978-1405193498
- ↑ London Zoo official website Archived 16 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine;"Humans strip bare for zoo exhibit". BBC News. 25 August 2005. Archived from the original on 11 February 2007. Retrieved 5 January 2010.;"Humans On Display At London's Zoo". CBS News. 26 August 2005. Archived from the original on 12 November 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2006.;"The human zoo? by Debra Saunders (a bit more critical)". Townhall. 1 September 2005. Archived from the original on 25 October 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2006.
- ↑ O'Mahony, John (11 August 2014). "Edinburgh's most controversial show: Exhibit B, a human zoo". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
- 1 2 3 Keller, Mitch (6 August 2006). "The Scandal at the Zoo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2008.
- ↑ Ziomek, Kirsten L. (2014). "The 1903 Human Pavilion: Colonial Realities and Subaltern Subjectivities in Twentieth-Century Japan". The Journal of Asian Studies. 73 (2): 493–516. doi:10.1017/S0021911814000011. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 43553298. S2CID 162521059.
- ↑ "ACHAC's 'Human Zoos' Exhibition: Scottish University Tour". French at Stirling. 14 June 2018. Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
Films
edit- The Couple in the Cage. 1997. Dir. Coco Fusco and Paula Eredia. 30 min.
- Régis Warnier, the film Man to Man. 2005.
- "From Bella Coola to Berlin". 2006. Dir. Barbara Hager. 48 minutes. Broadcaster – Bravo! Canada.
- "Indianer in Berlin: Hagenbeck's Volkerschau". 2006. Dir. Barbara Hager. Broadcaster – Discovery Germany Geschichte Channel.
- Alexander C. T. Geppert, Fleeting Cities. Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
- Sadiah Qureshi, Peoples on Parade: Exhibitions, Empire and Anthropology in Nineteenth-Century Britain (2011).
- "Human zoos. The invention of the savage" Archived 18 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Dir. Pascal Blanchard, Gilles Boëtsch, Nanette Jacomijn Snoep – exhibition catalogue – Actes Sud (2011)
- Sauvages. Au cœur des zoos humains, Dir. Pascal Blanchard, Bruno Victor-Pujebet – 90 minutes – Bonne Pioche production & Archipel (2018)
- Human Zoos: America's Forgotten History of Scientific Racism, Dir. John G. West (2019)
Bibliography
edit- Abbattista, Guido, Ethnic Expositions in Italy, 1880 to 1940. Humans on Exhibition (London-New York: Routledge, 2024)
- Ankerl, Guy. Coexisting Contemporary Civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharatai, Chinese, and Western, Geneva, INU Press, 2000, ISBN 2881550045.
- Conklin, Alice L., and Ian Christopher Fletcher. European Imperialism, 1830–1930: Climax and Contradiction. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 1999. ISBN 0395903858
- Dreesbach, Anne. Colonial Exhibitions: 'Völkerschauen' and the Display of the 'Other', European History Online, Mainz: Institute of European History, 2012.
- Grant, Kevin. A Civilised Savagery: Britain and the New Slaveries in Africa, 1884–1926. New York; Oxfordshire, England: Routledge, 2005.
- Lewis, R. Barry. Understanding humans : introduction to physical anthropology and archaeology. Belmont, Calif. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 2010.
- Oliveira, Cinthya. Human Rights & Exhibitions, 1789–1989, Journal of Museum Ethnography, no. 29, 2016, pp. 71–94.
- Penny, H. Glenn. Objects of Culture : Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany, The University of North Carolina Press, 2002.
- Porter, Louis, Porter, A. N., and Louis, William Roger. The Oxford History of the British Empire. Volume III, The Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999. Oxford History of the British Empire. Web.
- Qureshi, Sadiah. Robert Gordon Latham, Displayed Peoples, and the Natural History of Race: 1854–1866, The Historical Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, 2011, pp. 143–166.
- Rothfels, Nigel. Savages and Beasts : The Birth of the Modern Zoo, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
- Schofield, Hugh. Human Zoos: When Real People Were Exhibits, BBC News, 2011.
- India Andaman Jarawa Tribe in 'Shocking' Tourist Video, BBC News, 2012.
External links
edit
Media related to Human zoos at Wikimedia Commons- Human Zoos. The Invention of the Savage
- Human Zoos website
- Pascal Blanchard; Sandrine Lemaire; Nicolas Bancel (August 2000). "Human zoos – Racist theme parks for Europe's colonialists". Le Monde diplomatique.;
- "On A Neglected Aspect Of Western Racism", by Kurt Jonassohn, December 2000
- The Colonial Exposition of May 1931 Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine by Michael Vann
- "Official site of the Adelaide Human Zoo"
- Qureshi, Sadiah (2004), 'Displaying Sara Baartman, the 'Hottentot Venus', History of Science 42:233–257. Available online at Science History Publications.