This paleontological restoration is inaccurate, or its accuracy is disputed.
Reason: Presumably reconstructed based on original interpretation by Sun (1986) as a pennatulid (sea pen), now considered to be incorrect; Paracharnia is also supposed much more elongate than this. (See Dzik (2002) p. 325 for a photo of the fossil and an interpretative drawing)
You may ask further questions about the accuracy of this image at the image review page of Wikiproject Palaeontology on the English Wikipedia. Note that this image may be appropriate to illustrate obsolete paleontological views.
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.