Please remember that the non-free content criteria require that non-free images on Wikipedia must not "[be] used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." Use of historic images from press agencies must only be of a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts (which is the original market role, and is not allowed per policy).
- Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
- For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
- Template:Non-free use rationale 2 may be helpful for stating the rationale.
|image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.Description: This diagram was attached to an affidavit sworn in October 2000 by Talal Abu Rahma, the France 2 cameraman who filmed the reported shooting of Muhammad al-Durrah incident.
Source: Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, October 3, 2000, accessed October 14, 2009.
Copyright: Talal Abu Rahma or France 2
Fair-use rationale for use in Muhammad al-Durrah incident
editThough this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws, and the stricter requirements of Wikipedia's non-free content policies, because:
- It is a significant image, and has been presented in evidence at two court cases in Paris.
- The image has no monetary value that our use of it would affect.
- It has been made available free of charge by the copyright holder.
- It is being used for informational purposes in an article about the event it depicts.
- We have no reason to believe the copyright holder would object.
- The imagery and its historical significance are a key part of the story and the article would be significantly poorer without it.
- A French ballistics expert commissioned by Philippe Karsenty presented a diagram to the Paris Court of Appeal in 2008. It included a position called the "pita", in which several sources say Palestinian police officers stood, armed with automatic rifles.[1] This position does not appear on the France 2 cameraman's diagram in this image, which marks that area as "Fields". This is a crucial point. It's therefore important to show both diagrams side by side.
- ↑ Schlinger 2008, p. 60, figure 63; for a secondary source discussing "the pita," see Fallows 2003.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 00:43, 4 May 2017 | 419 × 237 (29 KB) | DatBot (talk | contribs) | Reduce size of non-free image (BOT - disable) | |
| 23:41, 8 January 2010 | No thumbnail | 766 × 435 (70 KB) | SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following page uses this file: