Wikipedia

East–West dichotomy

(Redirected from East-West relations)

In sociology, the East–West dichotomy refers to an ongoing rivalry between two non-geographically divided sides, Eastern and Western worlds opposing each other's belief, culture, governance, and less typically religion.

East–West dichotomy
A map of the "Western world" based-on Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 Clash of Civilizations. In turquoise are the Orthodox World and Latin America, which are either a part of the West or distinct civilizations intimately related to the West.
Regions generally considered to be the East or the Orient when referring from Europe are constituents of the Muslim world (Greater Middle East), and the Eastern world (Far East and Indian subcontinent)
A meeting of Japan, China, and the West (Shiba Kōkan, late 18th century)

Used in discussing such studies as management, economics, international relations, and linguistics, the concept is criticized for overlooking regional hybridity.[1]

The countries leaning towards The East world who involve in BRICS(red) and the countries leaning to The West involving in NATO(blue).

Divisions

edit

The criteria for the division is chiefly conceptual and not geographical; for instance Australia being located in the far eastern part of the map, has soft relationship with NATO and is enumerated as a West Core.[2]

Historical concepts

edit
In the 1700s, the Eastern world comprised the continents of Asia and Australia (New Holland).

The concept has been used in both "Eastern" and "Western" nations. Japanese sinologist Tachibana Shiraki, in the 1920s, wrote of the need to unify Asia—East Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia but excluding Central Asia and West Asia—and form a "New East" that might combine culturally in balancing against the West.[3] Japan continued to make much of the concept, known as Pan-Asianism, throughout World War II, in propaganda.[4] In China, it was encapsulated during the Cold War in a 1957 speech by Mao Zedong,[5] who launched a slogan when he said, "This is a war between two worlds. The West Wind cannot prevail over the East Wind; the East Wind is bound to prevail over the West Wind."[6]

Muslim percentages: green 50% and above, yellow 10-49%

To Western writers, in the 1940s, it became bound up with an idea of aggressive, "frustrated nationalism", which was seen as "intrinsically anti- or non-Western"; sociologist Frank Furedi wrote, "The already existing intellectual assessment of European nationalism adapted to the growth of the Third World variety by developing the couplet of mature Western versus immature Eastern nationalism.... This East-West dichotomy became an accepted part of Western political theory."[7] Iraqi novelist Dhu'l-Nun Ayyub would include aspects of this concept in his stories. An example can be found in his story "al-Dutkur Ibrahim" that portrays the character, Dr. Ibrahim, being the epitome of evil and corruption, and an anglophile who turns against his people's interests. Another example is in his 1957 story "Orphans on Christmas Day" in which an Iranian Man and a Viennese woman overcome cultural differences to be together. The story is regarded by critics as an allegory for potential peace between East and West during the height of colonialism.[8]

The 1978 book Orientalism, by Edward Said, was highly influential in further establishing concepts of the East–West dichotomy in the Western world, bringing into college lectures a notion of the East as seen as "characterized by religious sensibilities, familial social orders, and ageless traditions" in contrast to Western "rationality, material and technical dynamism, and individualism."[9]

More recently, the divide has also been posited as an Islamic "East" and an American and European "West."[10][11] Critics note that an Islamic/non-Islamic East–West dichotomy is complicated by the global dissemination of Islamic fundamentalism and by cultural diversity within Islamic nations, moving the argument "beyond that of an East-West dichotomy and into a tripartite situation."[12]

Applications

edit

The East–West dichotomy has been used in studying a range of topics, including management, economics and linguistics. Knowledge Creation and Management (2007) examines it as the difference in organizational learning between Western cultures and Eastern cultures.[13] It has been widely used in exploring the period of rapid economic growth that has been termed the "East-Asian miracle" in segments of East Asia, particularly the Asian Tigers, following World War II.[14] Some sociologists, in line with the West as a model of modernity posited by Arnold J. Toynbee, have perceived the economic expansion as a sign of the "Westernization" of the region, but others look for explanation in cultural/racial characteristics of the East, embracing concepts of fixed Eastern cultural identity in a phenomenon described as "New Orientalism".[15][16] Both approaches to the East–West dichotomy have been criticized for failing to take into account the historical hybridity of the regions.[17]

The concept has also been brought to bear on examinations of intercultural communication. Asians are widely described as embracing an "inductive speech pattern" in which a primary point is approached indirectly, but Western societies are said to use "deductive speech" in which speakers immediately establish their point.[18] That is attributed to a higher priority among Asians in harmonious interrelations, but Westerners are said to prioritize direct communication.[19] 2001's Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach described the East–West dichotomy linguistically as a "false dichotomy", noting that both Asian and Western speakers use both forms of communication.[20]

Criticism

edit
The Orient and the Occident, by Nicaise de Keyser (1854)

In addition to difficulties in defining regions and overlooking hybridity, the East–West dichotomy has been criticized for creating an artificial construct of regional unification that allows one voice to claim authority to speak for multitudes. In "The Triumph of the East?", Mark T. Berger speaks to the issue as relates to examination of the "East-Asian miracle":

The historical power of the East-West dichotomy, and the fixed conceptions of culture/race to which it is linked, have increasingly allowed the national elites of the region to speak not only for their 'nations,' but even for Asia and Asians.... There are numerous instances of Western scholars, intent on challenging North American and/or Western hegemony in both material and discursive terms, ending up uncritically privileging the elite narratives of power-holders in Asia as authentic representatives of a particular non-Western nation or social formation ... [21]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ↑ What We Mean by the West - Foreign Policy Research Institute
  2. ↑ "Australia's security relationships". www.aph.gov.au. Retrieved 2026-06-07.
  3. ↑ Li, Lincoln (1996). The China factor in Modern Japanese thought: the case of Tachibana Shiraki, 1881–1945. SUNY Series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture. SUNY Press. pp. 104–105. ISBN 0-7914-3039-1.
  4. ↑ Iriye, Akira (2002). Global community: the role of international organizations in the making of the contemporary world. University of California Press. p. 87. ISBN 0-520-23127-9.
  5. ↑ Kau, John K.; Leung (1992). "Notes". The Writings of Mao Zedong, 1949–1976: January 1956 – December 1957. Vol. 2. M. E. Sharpe. p. 773. ISBN 0-87332-392-0.
  6. ↑ Zedong, Mao (1992). Kau, Michael Y. M.; Leung, John K. (eds.). The Writings of Mao Zedong, 1949–1976: January 1956 – December 1957. Vol. 2. M.E. Sharpe. p. 775. ISBN 0-87332-392-0.
  7. ↑ Füredi, Frank (1994). Colonial wars and the politics of Third World nationalism. I.B.Tauris. pp. 115–116.
  8. ↑ El-Enany, Rasheed (18 April 2006). Arab Representations of the Occident: East-West Encounters in Arabic Fiction. Routledge. pp. 80–83. ISBN 9781134320998.
  9. ↑ Barnett, Suzanne Wilson; Van Jay Symons (2000). Asia in the undergraduate curriculum: a case for Asian studies in liberal arts education. East Gate. M.E. Sharpe. p. 99. ISBN 0-7656-0546-5.
  10. ↑ Meštrovic, 63.
  11. ↑ See also Chahuán, Eugenio (2006). "An East-West dichotomy: Islamophobia". In Schenker, Hillel; Ziad, Abu Zayyad (eds.). Islamophobia and anti-Semitism. A Palestine-Israel Journal Book. Markus Wiener Publishers. pp. 25–32. ISBN 1-55876-403-8.
  12. ↑ Khatib, Lina (2006). Filming the modern Middle East: politics in the cinemas of Hollywood and the Arab world. Library of Modern Middle East Studies, Library of International Relations. Vol. 57. I.B. Tauris. pp. 166–167, 173. ISBN 1-84511-191-5.
  13. ↑ Ichijō, Kazuo; Ikujirō Nonaka (2007). Knowledge creation and management: new challenges for managers. Oxford University Press US. p. 280. ISBN 978-0-19-515962-2.
  14. ↑ Norberg, Johan (2003). In defense of global capitalism. Cato Institute. p. 99. ISBN 1-930865-46-5.
  15. ↑ Meštrovic, Stjepan (1994). Balkanization of the West: The Confluence of Postmodernism and Postcommunism. Routledge. p. 61. ISBN 0-203-34464-2.
  16. ↑ Berger, Mark T. (1997). "The triumph of the East? The East-Asian Miracle and post-Cold War capitalism". In Borer, Douglas A. (ed.). The rise of East Asia: critical visions of the Pacific century. Routledge. pp. 260–261, 266. ISBN 0-415-16168-1.
  17. ↑ Berger, 275.
  18. ↑ Cheng, Winnie (2003). Intercultural conversation. Pragmatics & Beyond. Vol. 118. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 51. ISBN 90-272-5360-9.
  19. ↑ Cheng, 53.
  20. ↑ Scollon, Ronald (2001). Intercultural communication: a discourse approach. Language in Society. Vol. 21 (2 ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 94–95. ISBN 0-631-22418-1.
  21. ↑ Berger, 276

Further reading

edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=East–West_dichotomy&oldid=1358472469"